Register Now - Beyond Recruitment: The Future of Patient Site Engagement in Oncology Clinical Trials
|Articles|May 1, 2020

Applied Clinical Trials

  • Applied Clinical Trials-05-01-2020
  • Volume 29
  • Issue 5

EMA Wins Points for Its COVID-19 Responsiveness

The agency has taken the lead in orchestrating a series of meetings of the International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities to help share information and collaborate in speeding COVID-19 drug and vaccine development and approval.

Europe may not be winning huge praise yet for its response to the COVID-19 pandemic-embroiled as it is by divisions over everything from sharing resources to exit strategies-but the European Medicines Agency (EMA) is coming out of it with flying colors, particularly for its timely responses to drug developers’ and clinicians’ needs.

One was its judicious reminder last month of the risk of serious side effects with chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, in the face of growing advocacy-including from US President Donald Trump-for its use in treating the novel coronavirus. EMA points out that these products are known to potentially cause heart rhythm problems that could be exacerbated at high dose or if combined with azithromycin or other medicines that have similar effects on the heart, as well as side effects on the liver and kidneys and nerve cell damage that can lead to seizures and hypoglycemia.

“Clinical data are still very limited and inconclusive, and the beneficial effects of these medicines in COVID-19 have not been demonstrated,” EMA says. “A number of large, randomized clinical trials are looking at the benefits and risks of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in patients with COVID-19,” but “results from large, well-designed studies are needed to make any conclusions.”

EMA’s engagement goes way beyond warnings, however. Already in March it created the COVID-19 pandemic task force, to manage and coordinate discussions on relevant product development, authorization and surveillance, and to conduct post-authorization follow-up of relevant authorized products. In particular, it is helping to meet the new challenges of the current health threat in the complexity of the disease, the variety of potential or repurposed medicinal products for prophylaxis or treatment, and the need for rapid clinical trials across Europe.

In April, EMA produced updated guidance for medicine developers and pharmaceutical companies to help speed up medicine and vaccine development and approval for COVID-19, advising on how they should address the regulatory challenges arising from the pandemic. This encourages developers of potential vaccines or treatments to contact EMA as soon as possible to discuss their strategy for evidence-generation. Scientific advice is free of charge and can be fast-tracked for potential novel coronavirus treatments or vaccines, the agency reminds developers. It is urging the EU research community to prioritize large randomized controlled clinical studies as the most likely to generate the conclusive evidence needed to enable rapid development and approval of potential treatments, and to include all EU countries in these trials. And it is encouraging the pooling of EU research resources into large-scale, multi-center, multi-arm clinical trials.

EMA has also produced advice for sponsors of other clinical trials affected by the pandemic, covering how they should adjust trial management during the pandemic-in situations where, for example, protocol deviations are needed for dealing with the need for isolating participants, or for limited access to public spaces or the reallocation of healthcare professionals. It outlines some regulatory flexibilities that can be applied to help pharmaceutical companies cope with the consequences of the pandemic, ranging from marketing authorizations and regulatory procedures to manufacturing and importation of active pharmaceutical ingredients and finished products, and from quality variations to labeling and packaging requirements. “EMA will be flexible and pragmatic during the assessment of affected clinical trial data submitted as part of marketing authorization applications,” it adds, encouragingly.

The agency is taking a leading part in a new series of meetings of the International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities, being convened biweekly to allow medicine regulators worldwide to exchange information and work together in speeding COVID-19 medicine and vaccine development and approval. It has launched, also in April, a fast-track monitoring system to help prevent supply issues with crucial medicines used for treating COVID-19 patients.

And EMA’s staff-already strained by the shift from London to a temporary home in Amsterdam, and then a further shift into its new custom-built premises, as well as by staff sickness related to COVID-19-not only gave up their Easter break to keep essential work going to combat the pandemic, but they will also worked through the Spring holiday that was between April 27 and May 1.

As Shakespeare, whose birthday was celebrated last month, might have said of the agency:

“By how much unexpected, by so much

we must awake endeavor for defense;

For courage mounteth with occasion.”

 

Peter O'Donnell is a freelance journalist who specializes in European health affairs and is based in Brussels, Belgium

 

Related to this article

Closing the Community Access Gap: Q&A with Kent Thoelke, Paradigm Health
In this Q&A, Kent Thoelke, CEO of Paradigm Health, discusses why participation gaps in community and rural settings come down to both patient cost barriers and site infrastructure, how legacy workflows weigh on community clinics, and what policy and technology changes it would take to make clinical research a real care option for more patients.
© Grispb - © Grispb - stock.adobe.com
Mistral and OpenAI produced identical overall eligibility labels across 200 synthetic patient-study assessments, with criterion-level disagreements concentrated in inclusion criteria where models switch between “Uncertain” and “Not included” when records lack sufficient evidence, so model choice should be driven by deployment architecture, control, and cost rather than assumed interchangeability.
The Human Side of Clinical Trials: Before Burden Becomes Risk, Capturing Friction in Real Time
In Episode 4 of The Human Side of Clinical Trials, host Brian S. McGowan, PhD, FACEHP, chief learning officer and co-founder of ArcheMedX, Inc., speaks with Jason Riis, PhD, CEO and chief behavioral scientist at Behavioralize, about how capturing friction closer to the moment it happens can reveal unclear instructions, technology friction, and workarounds that retrospective surveys and debriefs tend to miss.