|Articles|February 1, 2012

Applied Clinical Trials

  • Applied Clinical Trials-02-01-2012
  • Volume 21
  • Issue 2

Increasing the Use of Technology in Feasibility

Industry Standards Research

For years ISR has tracked the dynamics that surround patient and investigator recruitment. Not surprisingly, the industry has challenges associated with recruiting patients into many of its clinical trials. These difficulties aren't confined to just recruiting the patients. The industry has struggled—and continues to struggle—with predicting the recruitment of patients; the process known as feasibility in our industry. For years the industry has relied on poor quality databases, rudimentary questionnaires, and fading technologies to estimate trial recruitment. Even today 36% of the industry relies on fax-based questionnaires to prospective sites to generate recruitment estimates.

But there is reason to be hopeful. In 2009, as part of its Patient and Investigator Recruitment Success research, ISR asked industry representatives how often they rely on various information sources, processes, and technologies as part of their feasibility and trial planning process. Only 14% of respondents indicated they used electronic medical records data to estimate recruitment and 49% indicated an intention to increase this use. It turns out their predictions were correct. In its 2012 update of this research ISR found that 21% of respondents are using EMR data for feasibility estimates. And just as important, 52% indicate that their use of EMR will continue to increase over the next three years.

—Industry Standard Research, www.ISRreports.com.

Articles in this issue

over 14 years ago

Pharmacovigilance Alliances

over 14 years ago

PPD Trains CRAs in Three Dimensions

over 14 years ago

Looking Beyond the Euro Turmoil

over 14 years ago

Give the Patient a Clear Voice

over 14 years ago

Strategic Partnership

over 14 years ago

Leveraging the Transition

Related to this article

© photon_photo - © photon_photo - stock.adobe.com
Standardized measurement across five oncology centers found that clinical research coordinators rated eSource-enabled workflows positively (Overall Mean Satisfaction 5.79 of 7), with reduced manual entry and electronic data transfer earning strong marks, while perceived reduction in sponsor and monitor queries lagged as the one domain below threshold.
Where the Industry Is Headed as Clinical, Operational, and Real-World Data Connect
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, describes the industry’s trajectory toward a unified intelligence orchestration environment—and explains why the future isn’t one model that knows everything, but a trusted system that brings the right evidence to the right human decision.
What Expanding AI Ecosystems Mean for Sponsor Complexity and Oversight
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, argues that CROs must act as orchestrators rather than aggregators—and that the real test of any AI ecosystem is whether it reduces sponsor coordination burden or just hands it back to them.