Register Now: Beyond EDC: Designing a Connected Data Strategy for Predictive Clinical Development
Commentary|Videos|October 1, 2025

2025 SCRS Global Site Solutions Summit: The Interoperability Challenges Sites Face With Clinical Trial Technology

Learn how the lack of integration across platforms creates complexity for sites and why holistic solutions are key to reducing data entry and system burden.

ACT: As technology use expands in clinical trials, what are the biggest challenges sites face when adapting to new platforms across different sponsors and studies?

Douglas: It's a great question, Andy. I think what we hear the most is because sponsors can pick and choose their tech stack, we see a lot of challenges with the lack of interoperability, and the lack of integration, which are the two biggest challenges that sites face today. If you can imagine how complex their world is, they're doing anywhere from 20-200 trials, they're working on anywhere from 20-22 systems per trial, it gets complicated with having to manage the multiple passwords. It's just the different pieces and parts, and then multiple costs and double data entry is very much a challenge that we hear from our sites. At Medidata, we're really trying to look holistically. As a holistic, integrated platform, we do have tools to move data from one to the other so we can eliminate that data entry, and we encourage the industry to continue to do the same.

In a video interview with Applied Clinical Trials prior to the 2025 SCRS Global Site Solutions Summit, Robin Douglas, VP, research site engagement, Medidata, discussed the challenges clinical trial sites face with the increasing use of technology, particularly the lack of interoperability and integration among different systems. She highlighted the complexity of managing multiple trials and systems, leading to issues like double data entry and high costs. Douglas also emphasized the importance of treating site staff as partners, involving them early in the process, and maintaining a consistent feedback loop. Additionally, there is a need for the industry to reduce redundant training and leverage artificial intelligence to automate tasks, freeing up staff for patient care.


Related to this article

© photon_photo - © photon_photo - stock.adobe.com
Standardized measurement across five oncology centers found that clinical research coordinators rated eSource-enabled workflows positively (Overall Mean Satisfaction 5.79 of 7), with reduced manual entry and electronic data transfer earning strong marks, while perceived reduction in sponsor and monitor queries lagged as the one domain below threshold.
Where the Industry Is Headed as Clinical, Operational, and Real-World Data Connect
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, describes the industry’s trajectory toward a unified intelligence orchestration environment—and explains why the future isn’t one model that knows everything, but a trusted system that brings the right evidence to the right human decision.
What Expanding AI Ecosystems Mean for Sponsor Complexity and Oversight
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, argues that CROs must act as orchestrators rather than aggregators—and that the real test of any AI ecosystem is whether it reduces sponsor coordination burden or just hands it back to them.
Where AI Governance in Clinical Development Falls Short
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, identifies three recurring failure modes in AI governance frameworks—and explains why responsible AI must be an ongoing operating discipline, not a one-time approval gate.