Commentary|Videos|October 30, 2025

Broad Survival Benefit from MATTERHORN Trial Highlights New Approach to Biomarker Use

Gain insight into how the MATTERHORN trial’s results across PD-L1 subgroups could expand access to immunotherapy and reshape biomarker strategies in early gastric and GEJ cancer treatment.

In a recent video interview with Applied Clinical Trials, Nancy Ghattas, VP, US Oncology Commercial Franchise Head of Immuno-Oncology, AstraZeneca, discussed the significance of the Phase III MATTERHORN trial (NCT04592913) results for patients with early-stage or locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers. She highlighted how the Imfinzi-based perioperative regimen demonstrated a 22% reduction in the risk of death and improved overall survival regardless of PD-L1 status, marking the first immunotherapy in this setting to show such benefit. Ghattas emphasized the trial’s potential to establish a new standard of care in gastric and GEJ cancers and reflected on how these findings align with AstraZeneca’s broader immuno-oncology strategy to bring curative-intent treatments to patients earlier in their cancer journey.

The below interview transcript was lightly edited for clarity.

ACT: With nearly 70% of patients alive at three years and survival benefits observed regardless of PD-L1 status, how could this data influence future biomarker strategies or patient selection in this setting?

Ghattas: The MATTERHORN data have shown [their] potential to become the new standard of care for a broad population of patients, regardless of subgroups or PD-L1 status. This brings new hope to more patients—especially in the early setting—which is unlike what we typically see in later lines of gastric cancer treatment, where PD-L1 is a marker for therapy.

This is not the situation with MATTERHORN. We are seeing overall survival of what you mentioned—seven out of 10, or a 22% benefit—for a broad population. And this is exactly what you want to see when we’re introducing new therapies and new treatment paradigms for a broad population of patients.


Related to this article

Where AI Leads in Trial Design—and Where Humans Still Need To
In this video interview, Claire Riches, VP of clinical solutions at Citeline, makes the case for AI as a sophisticated strategic advisor in trial design while arguing that humans must remain in the lead—especially when factors the model can't fully account for are at stake.