Case Study: Successful System Integration for Decentralized Clinical Trials endpoint Clinical and THREAD’s Solution Ensures the Successful Flow of eConsent Data
Today’s clinical studies are increasingly complex and require patient-centric trial designs, like decentralized trials, more than ever before. As trials incorporate more decentralized components there is an ever-present need for multiple system integrations to support the various trial functions, with the goal being that all trial data flows seamlessly between systems and is stored in one repository for efficient oversight and analysis. These numerous integrated systems require closely managed integration, synchronization, and supportive partnerships to minimize error and maximize efficiency. In this case study, partners endpoint and THREAD dig-in to explore how IRT can be integrated with decentralized clinical trial (DCT) technology, working through tightly integrated workflows, to provide a streamlined process, a better user experience for Sites and Participants, higher quality data and real-time access to information.
The planned sites in Livonia, Las Vegas, and San Antonio would expand a partnership that places clinical research and health screenings inside Walmart stores.
In this video interview, Kent Thoelke, CEO of Paradigm Health, calls for safe harbor protections, CMS reimbursement safeguards, and funding mechanisms modeled on EHR meaningful use to help community and rural institutions participate in research on par with academic centers.
In today’s ACT Brief, we examine why community and rural patients lack access to research as a care option, what makes AI assistants trustworthy in regulated trials, and how FDA draft guidance could let gene editing therapies cover patient-specific variants.
In this Q&A, E.K. Koh, chief product officer at Suvoda, discusses what separates a trustworthy AI assistant from one that adds risk, why curated clinical knowledge matters more than general-purpose flexibility, and what safeguards must be in place when assistants move from answering questions to taking actions in clinical trial systems.
In this video interview, Kent Thoelke, CEO of Paradigm Health, explains why patients in community and rural settings too often lack access to clinical research as a care option, and how closing that gap could improve outcomes and lower long-term costs.
In today’s ACT Brief, we examine why anti-kickback guidance and EHR-integrated trial matching must work together in community settings, why real-time trials depend on mature risk-based quality management, and how pharma is applying digital clones to predict outcomes.
The FDA’s RTCT initiative transmits predefined, clinically meaningful signals to regulators during active trials, so its value depends entirely on the maturity of sponsors’ upstream RBQM signal intelligence, KRIs, QTLs, and root-cause context, rather than on data speed.
In this video interview, Kent Thoelke, CEO of Paradigm Health, outlines why anti-kickback guidance and modern EHR-integrated trial matching technology must work in tandem to reach representative patient populations at the community level.