
|Articles|July 24, 2015
Cogstate Releases Online Cognitive Screening Solution for Alzheimer's Trial
This new version release optimizes patient recruitment with study-specific prescreening workflows and a delivery platform that allows for self-administered cognitive assessments on any modality including tablet-based assessments
Advertisement
Cogstate, a cognitive science and medical technology company, announced the latest version of its remote cognitive assessment solution for pre-screening participants in clinical trials, Precision Recruitment™ 2.1.
This new version release optimizes patient recruitment with study-specific prescreening workflows and a delivery platform that allows for self-administered cognitive assessments on any modality including tablet-based assessments. Other important new features include:
- Functionality allowing pre-screened participants to select an investigator site in their area, with automatic site notification for a more seamless enrolment process.
- The ability to deploy the solution in many different languages, as required for global clinical trials
Advertisement
Related to this article

AI can turn complex protocols into first-pass budget inputs, letting sponsors start budgeting sooner while budget builders shift from data entry to review.

Trialbee CEO Matt Walz explores the current impact of AI in delivering practical gains in clinical development and reflects on its future potential, where enrollment predictability may be the biggest prize of all.

In this video interview, Carole Berini, PhD, of Ontada, explains how validated proxies for variables like ECOG performance status can recover not just sample size but the representativeness of hard-to-reach patient populations in real-world oncology studies.

A biomarker test now decides who enters a precision medicine trial, yet results often go unused and assays are not ready when screening opens.

In today's ACT Brief, we examine proportionate analysis frequency in RBQM, how to build trust into real-world evidence foundations for cancer trials, and how rare disease developers monetize regulatory success.

Real-time RBQM requires proportionate analysis frequency matched to data arrival and issue criticality, not continuous reanalysis, because signal churn from over-frequent runs creates alert fatigue and operational noise that obscures meaningful deterioration.

In this video interview, Saamir Pasha and Carole Berini, PhD, of Ontada, explain how building trust into the data foundation—through source lineage, standardization, and reconciliation—is what makes reliable real-world evidence generation in oncology possible.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Applied Clinical Trials Online
1
Real-Time Data, Right-Time Decisions: Rethinking Analysis Frequency in RBQM
2
AI and Patient Recruitment: Can Predictive Promise Drive True Transformation?
3
FDA Releases Transparency Roadmap Outlining Disclosure Priorities Across Drug Development and Regulatory Review
4
How Routine Lab Markers Can Stand In for Missing Functional Status Data
5
