Commentary|Videos|November 20, 2024

Creating a Global Standard for Data Sources

In this video interview, Mark Melton, vice president of biospecimen data and operations, Slope, highlights the clinical research industry’s need for more regulation around collecting data.

In a recent video interview with Applied Clinical Trials, Mark Melton, vice president of biospecimen data and operations, Slope, discussed navigating data challenges in clinical trials, emphasizing the need for understanding complex data sources and ensuring a proper chain of custody for samples. Melton highlighted the importance of data mapping to standardize reporting across different labs and the necessity of secure data transfer to protect patient privacy.

A transcript of Melton’s conversation with ACT can be found below.

ACT: How can sponsors better navigate some of the current data challenges in clinical trials?

Melton: If there was one area I would challenge the industry in, it’s ensuring that as quickly as possible, that we have the ability to, number one, establish a chain of custody, but number two is also, how do we ensure inside that chain of custody that the data that's being reported out before the sample is ever tested to give a result for whatever that assay or test may be, so all the data leading up to that is accurate. Right now, the biggest challenge in the industry is the fact that with these different data sources, they have different databases that report differently. Imagine you have six labs that speak different languages. How do you translate that? There's a concept called data mapping where you ingest that data, you map it to a common language, and then you're able to compare it. I think that's the biggest area that we have to regulate. We have to ensure that regulators are recognizing this problem, like the FDA, EMA, or whatever other governing bodies throughout the world, that ensures a standard, and right now we don't have a standard.


Related to this article

Why Seizure Counts Alone Can't Define Success in Epilepsy Trials
In this video interview, Amélie Lothe, global medical community head for rare epilepsies at UCB Pharma, explains why the full burden of developmental and epileptic encephalopathies extends far beyond clinical symptoms—and why endpoints must reflect what families are actually hoping for.
What This Study Means for Sponsors Still Struggling to Justify RBQM at Scale
In this video interview, Sylviane de Viron of CluePoints and Abigail Dirks of Tufts CSDD explain how ICH E6(R3) and new empirical evidence of RBQM's net financial impact give sponsors the tools they need to build the multi-functional buy-in required for successful adoption—and why RBQM only delivers full value when it replaces, not supplements, traditional monitoring.
The Human Side of Clinical Trials: How Measuring Readiness at Training Predicts Trial Risk Before It Shows Up in the Data
This episode of The Human Side of Clinical Trials, hosted by Brian S. McGowan, PhD, FACEHP, chief learning officer and co-founder of ArcheMedX, Inc., and Kelly Ritch, chief operating officer of ArcheMedX, Inc., explores why training completion metrics like attendance and quiz scores fail to capture true study readiness, and how measuring both competence and confidence can reveal trial risks before enrollment even begins.