Register Now: Beyond EDC: Designing a Connected Data Strategy for Predictive Clinical Development
|Articles|July 21, 2011

CRO Beaufort Introduce Quality Oversight Services

Clinical research organization (CRO) Beaufort has added quality oversight to its services for clients in the pharmaceutical , diagnostic, and medical device industries.
 
Beaufort has been engaged by a Top 20 Global Pharmaceutical Company to conduct quality oversight monitoring (QOM) visits for the company’s clinical trials.The partnership will help the company manage vendor quality and compliance during clinical trials in a uniform, quality-focused, efficient, and effective manner.

“The need for quality oversight monitoring continues to grow,” said John Wilson, Beaufort Senior Vice President of clinical operations. “Increased scrutiny and enforcement activity from the FDA and other regulatory agencies has heightened awareness among sponsors and CROs of the need to ensure the integrity of clinical research data.”
 
The Beaufort quality oversight team will provide the pharmaceutical company an understanding of how each of its studies is being conducted by the company’s other CROs. Beaufort will not audit the CROs, but will observe, critically assess and provide objective and unbiased feedback on the respective CRO clinical research associates’ level of knowledge, experience, and training for the specified trials. The company can then use those observations to provide feedback to the CRO.
 
Sponsors of clinical investigations, as well as CROs, have come under increased scrutiny recently from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for failing to ensure proper monitoring  of clinical trials. The FDA holds sponsors ultimately responsible and accountable for the quality of work performed on their behalf. Recent FDA BIMO audits have cited numerous diagnostic, drug, and device companies for multiple issues such as:
 
-Failure to follow the protocol
-Failure to keep adequate and accurate records
-Problems with the informed consent form
-Failure to report adverse events
-Failure to account for the disposition of study drugs
 


Related to this article

© photon_photo - © photon_photo - stock.adobe.com
Standardized measurement across five oncology centers found that clinical research coordinators rated eSource-enabled workflows positively (Overall Mean Satisfaction 5.79 of 7), with reduced manual entry and electronic data transfer earning strong marks, while perceived reduction in sponsor and monitor queries lagged as the one domain below threshold.
Where the Industry Is Headed as Clinical, Operational, and Real-World Data Connect
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, describes the industry’s trajectory toward a unified intelligence orchestration environment—and explains why the future isn’t one model that knows everything, but a trusted system that brings the right evidence to the right human decision.