Aardvark released exploratory data from its stopped Phase 3 HERO trial in Prader-Willi syndrome after FDA lifted the hold, and plans a redesigned Phase 3.
|Articles|November 1, 2010
CRO Selects CTMS Solution for Global Complex Clinical Trial Support
Advertisement
“BioClinica is pleased to be selected by Cato Research for its clinical trial management needs after such an indepth selection process,” said Peter Benton, President of BioClinica’s eClinical division. “We have seen a significant increase in customer interest in our CTMS solutions because these solutions provide the scalability needed to support global research and the flexibility sponsors need to create more efficient eClinical environments.”
CTMS applications help to manage business and operational processes for clinical trials by capturing and manipulating the trial data electronically. BioClinica’s CTMS capabilities include applications to manage data related to clinical sites, personnel, subjects, and clinical supplies; scheduling, tracking, and monitoring performance; site payments; study document management; vendors; and more. BioClinica Office-Smart Clinical Trial Manager (Office-Smart CTMS) is supported by Microsoft SharePoint and BioClinica technologies to provide team collaboration, connectivity, and efficiency in a multisite environment. With its ClinBUS Connector, BioClinica’s CTMS interfaces with a variety of systems, such as electronic data capture and interactive voice or web response systems, to allow full integration of all clinical data.
Advertisement
Related to this article
Clinical trials capture data faster than ever, but the real bottleneck is the distance between data capture and a decision teams can trust.
In today’s ACT Brief, we examine why the future of AI in trials is a trusted orchestration system rather than a single model, how coordinators rate eSource-enabled workflows, and what a bipartisan bill proposes for reusable trial networks.
The Faster Clinical Trials Act would create an FDA Center for Clinical Trial Innovation and aims to cut trial costs and enrollment time by at least 30%.
Standardized measurement across five oncology centers found that clinical research coordinators rated eSource-enabled workflows positively (Overall Mean Satisfaction 5.79 of 7), with reduced manual entry and electronic data transfer earning strong marks, while perceived reduction in sponsor and monitor queries lagged as the one domain below threshold.
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, describes the industry’s trajectory toward a unified intelligence orchestration environment—and explains why the future isn’t one model that knows everything, but a trusted system that brings the right evidence to the right human decision.
In today’s ACT Brief, we examine how sites can avoid both fear-driven and overly aggressive AI adoption, why community-based research needs sustained financial investment, and why patient access matters more than organizational size.
Pacing obesity trial enrollment, anchoring eligibility to stable real-world therapies, and building site and physician relationships improve retention and data quality more than aggressive recruitment or restrictive exclusion criteria do.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Applied Clinical Trials Online
1
Building Standardized Evidence for eSource-Enabled Clinical Trials: Multi-Site Validation of a Clinical Research Coordinator Satisfaction Methodology
2
Clinical Trials Do Not Have a Data Problem, They Have a Decision-Readiness Problem
3
ACT Brief: Orchestrated AI Clinical Environments, eSource Coordinator Satisfaction, and Faster Clinical Trials Act
4
Where the Industry Is Headed as Clinical, Operational, and Real-World Data Connect
5