Aardvark released exploratory data from its stopped Phase 3 HERO trial in Prader-Willi syndrome after FDA lifted the hold, and plans a redesigned Phase 3.
|Articles|May 1, 2007
- Applied Clinical Trials-05-01-2007
- Volume 0
- Issue 0
eShowcase: CTSD Version 2.5
CTSD Version 2.5 provides improved data visualization and enhanced user interface
Advertisement
CTSD Version 2.5 provides improved data visualization and enhanced user interface
Phase Forward (Waltham, MA) has released Version 2.5 of its Clinical Trials Signal Detection (CTSD) system. CTSD detects, evaluates, and tracks potential safety signals, which allows biopharmaceutical companies to analyze and classify potential safety signals, develop a product safety profile, and make more informed decisions earlier in the drug development process.
CTSD 2.5 adds an enhanced user interface that features summary displays, data visualization tools, and access to trial data without programming. The user interface's interactive displays facilitate safety review workflow by including patient level drill downs, Lab Trend graphs, an Exposure Summary graph, and Kaplan-Meier plots. It also offers Hy's Law alerts and a full set of Standardized MedDRA Queries (SMQs).
The product is integrated with Phase Forward's Web Submission Data Manager (WebSDM) platform and offers CDISC support.
Phase Forward, (781) 890-7878,
Articles in this issue
over 19 years ago
CRO Shifts in the Outsourcing Marketover 19 years ago
Consent Forms: No Easy Readover 19 years ago
Investigative Sites Unlock the Door to Success in Indiaover 19 years ago
Trials for Pediatrics and Proteins Under Debateover 19 years ago
eShowcase: Clinical Trial Analysisover 19 years ago
Vendor Quality Assurance Audits: A Formula for Successover 19 years ago
Ukraine Emerges as a Viable Location for Global Studiesover 19 years ago
Europe is Disenchanted with Trials Directiveover 19 years ago
eShowcase: Data JumpStartAdvertisement
Related to this article
Clinical trials capture data faster than ever, but the real bottleneck is the distance between data capture and a decision teams can trust.
In today’s ACT Brief, we examine why the future of AI in trials is a trusted orchestration system rather than a single model, how coordinators rate eSource-enabled workflows, and what a bipartisan bill proposes for reusable trial networks.
The Faster Clinical Trials Act would create an FDA Center for Clinical Trial Innovation and aims to cut trial costs and enrollment time by at least 30%.
Standardized measurement across five oncology centers found that clinical research coordinators rated eSource-enabled workflows positively (Overall Mean Satisfaction 5.79 of 7), with reduced manual entry and electronic data transfer earning strong marks, while perceived reduction in sponsor and monitor queries lagged as the one domain below threshold.
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, describes the industry’s trajectory toward a unified intelligence orchestration environment—and explains why the future isn’t one model that knows everything, but a trusted system that brings the right evidence to the right human decision.
In today’s ACT Brief, we examine how sites can avoid both fear-driven and overly aggressive AI adoption, why community-based research needs sustained financial investment, and why patient access matters more than organizational size.
Pacing obesity trial enrollment, anchoring eligibility to stable real-world therapies, and building site and physician relationships improve retention and data quality more than aggressive recruitment or restrictive exclusion criteria do.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Applied Clinical Trials Online
1
Where the Industry Is Headed as Clinical, Operational, and Real-World Data Connect
2
Clinical Trials Do Not Have a Data Problem, They Have a Decision-Readiness Problem
3
ACT Brief: Orchestrated AI Clinical Environments, eSource Coordinator Satisfaction, and Faster Clinical Trials Act
4
Building Standardized Evidence for eSource-Enabled Clinical Trials: Multi-Site Validation of a Clinical Research Coordinator Satisfaction Methodology
5