Inhibrx Biosciences, a clinical-stage biotech with a lean team is one company centering oversight around CTMS. While 75% of its studies are outsourced to CROs, Bonne Adams, president of operations at Inhibrx, views CTMS as essential. “The CTMS is your base system for setting up all other systems. Study metrics and global contacts all flow from your CTMS to other systems,” Adams explains.
Portfolio management matters
Oversight and portfolio management go hand in hand, and both are particularly important for organizations venturing into their first or second product. Since long-term success can be shaped by how well the first few trials go, understanding and managing the portfolio is especially critical for emerging biotechs.
Organizations conducting their first trials should ask these questions:
- What systems do we have to monitor trial progress, manage trial documents and data, and collaborate with CROs?
- Do we have the resources to manage our current pipeline and scale for the future?
- Are our people, processes, and technology seamlessly connected for successful trial oversight?
With a CTMS, sponsors can track enrollment within the desired timeline and garner insight into the progress of each study and the overall portfolio. Managing a portfolio in an advanced CTMS provides real-time reporting and analysis, which is especially beneficial when a company is managing products in different phases.
Biotechs can also improve portfolio management by using CTMS to see trends and gain insights, driving proactive actions and closer collaboration with CROs. Sponsors can leverage the data to identify issues, such as disproportionate spending or delayed enrollment, for informed study and vendor management.
Regulations make a case for technology
Similar to oversight guidelines in ICH E6 (R3), FDA guidance addresses the use of computerized systems in clinical trials. At its core, the regulatory guidance is designed to ensure the safety of patients and maintain trial integrity. Addressing technology specifically, the FDA is concerned with how “data quality might be satisfied where computerized systems are being used to create, modify, maintain, archive, retrieve, or transmit clinical data.”
Within that framework, a CTMS is a modern solution that enables close monitoring of study activities to confirm trials are following protocols and regulations. Through documentation, such as user tasks, trial master file (TMF) oversight, and research site monitoring visit reports, sponsors have an auditable record of their oversight activities. This is an important asset to satisfy regulatory requirements.
While the use of technology is not required by law, an unprecedented level of detail and data is mandatory to report to regulatory bodies. For biotechs, a common concern is reaching the trial endpoint only to realize the data quality doesn’t meet the required standard.
Advanced features in a CTMS, like automating data transfers between sponsors and CROs daily, can save significant time and effort while increasing visibility into study status. Given today’s evolving regulatory landscape, ensuring every step of the trial contains detailed, documented, and audit-ready data is critical.
End-to-end oversight is possible
Laying a foundation for continuous and real-time oversight is no longer solely motivated by regulatory obligations. Clinical phase biotechs are driving change and innovation in how trials are outsourced to meet accelerated timelines with a small team and limited resources. Given the high cost of conducting clinical trials, oversight delays at any study phase can have significant impacts. By adopting and owning clinical trial solutions, biotechs can identify roadblocks early and adjust strategies to move forward quickly.
Modern process-based systems can support operations for fast-growing companies regardless of whether they run their trials in-house or outsource to CROs. Effective oversight helps ensure trial success, but it hinges on the ability of sponsors to have control of their data. A modern CTMS streamlines processes, simplifies access, and improves decision-making, helping biotechs navigate the complexities of running a clinical trial. Now, when regulators pose questions, they can answer with full confidence in the integrity of their data and documents.
Henry Galio, vice president, Veeva clinical strategy