Commentary|Videos|October 23, 2025

Global Breast Cancer Trials Show Progress in Diversity, But Gaps Remain

Examining how shifting leadership patterns in breast cancer research signal growing international participation—and the continued need for broader equity in global trials.

In a recent video interview Applied Clinical Trials, Gen Li, PhD, MBA, president, Phesi, highlighted results from the company’s new analysis on global inequity in breast cancer development.He discussed the geographic concentration of breast cancer trial leaders in the US and China, with a positive outlook on global diversity. Operational barriers in lower-income countries were attributed to traditional business models, with opportunities to implement a more patient-centric approach by leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning. Li addressed the lack of local KOLs in underserved areas by emphasizing the importance of identifying local leaders. He also stressed the need to redistribute trial workloads and improve recruitment by using AI to identify and activate new sites.

ACT: Phesi’s analysis shows that nearly half of all top breast cancer trial leaders are based in the US or China. What challenges does this geographic concentration pose for global trial diversity and equity?

Li: I actually look at it rather positively. There is a more narrowed distribution before. Now you are actually seeing China, Korea, Japan, Spain—all of those countries are now actually having KOLs among those top 10s. That's positive progress, but doesn't mean we have done enough. It doesn't mean we cannot further to improve, but I think overall, we are actually going to the right direction.


Related to this article

© C Davids/peopleimages.com - © C Davids/peopleimages.com - stock.adobe.com
The clinical research industry talks about patient-centeredness constantly but embeds it too late, too narrowly, and without clear ownership, and the cost shows up in enrollment failures, protocol deviations, and outcomes that don't reflect what patients actually care about.
What the Epilepsy Community Has Taught Us About Trial Feasibility
In this video interview, Amélie Lothe, global medical community head for rare epilepsies at UCB Pharma, shares what she has learned firsthand from families living with Dravet syndrome and CDKL5 deficiency disorder about what makes trial participation possible—and what makes it not.
Why Seizure Counts Alone Can't Define Success in Epilepsy Trials
In this video interview, Amélie Lothe, global medical community head for rare epilepsies at UCB Pharma, explains why the full burden of developmental and epileptic encephalopathies extends far beyond clinical symptoms—and why endpoints must reflect what families are actually hoping for.
What It Actually Means to Embed the Patient Voice in Trial Design
In this video interview, Amélie Lothe, global medical community head for rare epilepsies at UCB Pharma, explains why genuine patient partnership begins before the protocol is written—and what it looks like when patients and caregivers tell you a trial was designed with them in mind.
What This Study Means for Sponsors Still Struggling to Justify RBQM at Scale
In this video interview, Sylviane de Viron of CluePoints and Abigail Dirks of Tufts CSDD explain how ICH E6(R3) and new empirical evidence of RBQM's net financial impact give sponsors the tools they need to build the multi-functional buy-in required for successful adoption—and why RBQM only delivers full value when it replaces, not supplements, traditional monitoring.