Register Now - Beyond Recruitment: The Future of Patient Site Engagement in Oncology Clinical Trials
News|Articles|October 3, 2023

LEO Pharma Connects Affiliates with Veeva Vault Safety

Veeva Systems has announced that LEO Pharma is using Veeva Vault Safety to optimize its safety operations. With this foundation, the company can incorporate affiliates into safety workflows, boost operational efficiencies, ensure compliance, and unify its global pharmacovigilance data on one platform.

“LEO Pharma is deeply committed to the safety of patients using its products,” said Pilar Carrero, vice president of global safety at LEO Pharma in a press release. “With Veeva Vault Safety, we now have real-time visibility into adverse events and data transparency for affiliates that helps us work even better together.”

Vault Safety is helping LEO Pharma improve oversight of case intake, processing, submission, and distribution while simplifying safety workflows and eliminating data reconciliation with affiliates and partners. By standardizing drug development on Veeva Development Cloud, LEO Pharma can better connect safety to other crucial business areas like clinical, regulatory, and quality.

“Now, all parties have visibility into case data, ownership, and status, facilitating improved collaboration and sharing of learnings,” said John Lawrie, vice president of Vault Safety at Veeva in a press release. “Veeva is happy to partner with LEO Pharma to make its safety operations simpler and more effective.”

Vault Safety is a safety case management system that enables adverse event intake, processing, and submission for clinical and marketed products. It is part of Veeva Development Cloud.

Reference

LEO Pharma Connects Affiliates with Veeva Vault Safety to Transform Safety Operations. (2023, October 3). Veeva.


Related to this article

Closing the Community Access Gap: Q&A with Kent Thoelke, Paradigm Health
In this Q&A, Kent Thoelke, CEO of Paradigm Health, discusses why participation gaps in community and rural settings come down to both patient cost barriers and site infrastructure, how legacy workflows weigh on community clinics, and what policy and technology changes it would take to make clinical research a real care option for more patients.
© Grispb - © Grispb - stock.adobe.com
Mistral and OpenAI produced identical overall eligibility labels across 200 synthetic patient-study assessments, with criterion-level disagreements concentrated in inclusion criteria where models switch between “Uncertain” and “Not included” when records lack sufficient evidence, so model choice should be driven by deployment architecture, control, and cost rather than assumed interchangeability.
The Human Side of Clinical Trials: Before Burden Becomes Risk, Capturing Friction in Real Time
In Episode 4 of The Human Side of Clinical Trials, host Brian S. McGowan, PhD, FACEHP, chief learning officer and co-founder of ArcheMedX, Inc., speaks with Jason Riis, PhD, CEO and chief behavioral scientist at Behavioralize, about how capturing friction closer to the moment it happens can reveal unclear instructions, technology friction, and workarounds that retrospective surveys and debriefs tend to miss.