|Articles|June 30, 2015

Mining Twitter Hashtags to Find Unknown Drug Issues

A team of scientists at the University of Vermont has invented a new technique for discovering potentially dangerous drug interactions and unknown side-effects using Twitter hashtags.

 

A team of scientists at the University of Vermont has invented a new technique for discovering potentially dangerous drug interactions and unknown side-effects using Twitter hashtags. 

Previous studies have shown that Twitter can be mined for bad drug interactions, but the Vermont team advances this idea by focusing on the distinctive information contained in hashtags-like “#overprescribed,” “#kidneystoneprobs,” and “#skinswelling”-to find new associations. The overall goal of the project, supported by the National Science Foundation, was to discover is to discover any relationship between two drugs that is not known.

Using their new algorithm, the team has created a website that will allow an investigator to explore the connections between search terms (say "albuterol"), existing scientific studies indexed in PubMed-and Twitter hashtags associated with the terms and studies.

A report on how the algorithm works, and its preliminary discoveries, was published online, June 8, in the Journal of Biomedical Informatics.

 

Read the full release here.


Related to this article

© C Davids/peopleimages.com - © C Davids/peopleimages.com - stock.adobe.com
The clinical research industry talks about patient-centeredness constantly but embeds it too late, too narrowly, and without clear ownership, and the cost shows up in enrollment failures, protocol deviations, and outcomes that don't reflect what patients actually care about.
The Human Side of Clinical Trials: How Measuring Readiness at Training Predicts Trial Risk Before It Shows Up in the Data
This episode of The Human Side of Clinical Trials, hosted by Brian S. McGowan, PhD, FACEHP, chief learning officer and co-founder of ArcheMedX, Inc., and Kelly Ritch, chief operating officer of ArcheMedX, Inc., explores why training completion metrics like attendance and quiz scores fail to capture true study readiness, and how measuring both competence and confidence can reveal trial risks before enrollment even begins.