The number of countries used in commercially sponsored Phase III clinical trials has not changed in recent years.
Are pharmaceutical company Phase III clinical trials becoming more complex? The most broadly based database available, ClinicalTrials.gov, does not support the assertion that clinical trials have become more complex in study/protocol design or execution. Illustrative is the number of countries used in pharmaceutical company sponsored Phase III clinical trials.
The number of countries used in commercially sponsored Phase III clinical trials has not changed in recent years. It is essential to stratify the results or otherwise the data appear to show that the number of countries per study has actually declined, so we stratified the studies by planned study duration: less than one year, 1 to 2 years and 3 or more years. This is important because the longer the planned study, the more likely the study may be opening sites in additional countries. When stratified this way, the data show practically no change over the years covered.
Average Number of Countries per Study by Designed Study Duration by Year
Source: Department of Health Policy and Public Policy, University of the Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, using ClinicalTrials.gov data.
Stay current in clinical research with Applied Clinical Trials, providing expert insights, regulatory updates, and practical strategies for successful clinical trial design and execution.
Unifying Industry to Better Understand GCP Guidance
May 7th 2025In this episode of the Applied Clinical Trials Podcast, David Nickerson, head of clinical quality management at EMD Serono; and Arlene Lee, director of product management, data quality & risk management solutions at Medidata, discuss the newest ICH E6(R3) GCP guidelines as well as how TransCelerate and ACRO have partnered to help stakeholders better acclimate to these guidelines.
FDA Issues Complete Response Letter to Replimune for RP1 Combination Therapy in Advanced Melanoma
July 22nd 2025The FDA’s complete response letter cited concerns that the Phase I/II IGNYTE (NCT03767348) trial in advanced melanoma was not an adequate, well-controlled study and that its heterogeneous patient population limited interpretability, preventing approval in its current form.