The new effort combines adaptive platform trial design, AI-enabled site activation, nationwide data infrastructure, and patient data contribution tools to reduce timelines, costs, and patient burden across clinical development.
|Articles|April 23, 2015
Oracle Offers CluePoints Solution for RBM
Combined solution can help identify trial risks in operational and clinical data before traditional methods.
Advertisement
CluePoints, a provider of Centralized Statistical Monitoring solutions for clinical trials, today announced their collaboration with Oracle Health Sciences, combining CluePoints' risk-based monitoring (RBM) solution with Oracle’s clinical data capture and management platform,
The resulting solution can help deliver a complete trial review process that proactively identifies risk in both clinical and operational data throughout a clinical trial. These include operational risks, such as those outlined by industry consortiums, as well as risks seen through the analysis of clinical data that highlight anomalies or inconsistent data patterns at study, region or site levels that otherwise may not have been identified.
Advertisement
Related to this article
In this video interview, Claire Riches, VP of clinical solutions at Citeline, explains how AI is shifting trial risk management from reactive to proactive—enabling sponsors to pressure-test protocols and anticipate pivots before a single patient is enrolled.
In today's ACT Brief, we examine AI's role as trial design advisor with human leadership, how to govern autonomous agents in regulated operations, and real-world outcomes from switching to oral weight-loss therapy.
AI agents in clinical operations acquire broader autonomous capability through expanded permissions, tools, memory, and delegated authority, requiring governance focused on whether effective capability has shifted outside approved boundaries rather than whether software has changed.
In this video interview, Claire Riches, VP of clinical solutions at Citeline, makes the case for AI as a sophisticated strategic advisor in trial design while arguing that humans must remain in the lead—especially when factors the model can't fully account for are at stake.
In today's ACT Brief, we examine how data drives honest enrollment assumptions, why RWE infrastructure lags ambition, and the disconnect between FDA rulemaking and enforcement on compounded therapies.
RWE is finding a role earlier in drug development than ever before, but the data quality, integration, and organizational alignment required to make it regulatory-grade are still catching up to the ambition.
In this video interview, Claire Riches, VP of clinical solutions at Citeline, explains why combining analog trial performance data with real-world patient data and site-level recruitment history gives sponsors a far more honest picture of whether their enrollment assumptions are actually achievable.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Applied Clinical Trials Online
1
The Control Plane for Agentic Clinical Operations: Governing Autonomous Digital Actors in Regulated Trials
2
Where AI Leads in Trial Design—and Where Humans Still Need To
3
Real-World Evidence Is Moving Upstream: Is the Data Infrastructure Ready?
4
The Data Inputs That Matter Most When Pressure-Testing a Protocol's Feasibility
5