Commentary|Videos|October 1, 2024

Driving Point-of-care Decisions With RWE

In this video interview with ACT editor Andy Studna, Rich Gliklich, founder of OM1 highlights personalized medicine and predicting disease outcomes.

ACT: Looking forward, how will real-world evidence (RWE) drive point-of-care decisions?

Gliklich: I love this question because one of the reasons we started OM1 was to both advance medical research, but also to personalize medicine. We think about point-of-care a lot. We developed this, what I would call a digital phenotyping platform called PhenOM and you can think of it as a single assay. Instead of many different AI models, it's one model, one model to rule them all. What it does is it looks for over 500 different dimensions of signals that almost look like a fingerprint, if you actually look at that, and then different areas of that fingerprint might be associated with diagnoses that either have been discovered or not, might be associated with likelihood to respond to a particular treatment or the risk of a particular event, one of things we predict now is the likelihood of death in two years or a cardiovascular event in the next two years. We can use it also to generate for any individual health trajectory, so I come in, I see the doctor for X, Y, and Z; we're doing this now in depression and we're doing it in joint surgery. As the physician is offering me a treatment or procedure, what's likely to happen to patients like me over the next ‘X’ period of time down to the key outcomes that I'm interested in. I think that this is going to personalize the treatment paradigm more so than anything we've seen to date, so that's really exciting.


Related to this article

Where the Industry Is Headed as Clinical, Operational, and Real-World Data Connect
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, describes the industry’s trajectory toward a unified intelligence orchestration environment—and explains why the future isn’t one model that knows everything, but a trusted system that brings the right evidence to the right human decision.
© photon_photo - © photon_photo - stock.adobe.com
Standardized measurement across five oncology centers found that clinical research coordinators rated eSource-enabled workflows positively (Overall Mean Satisfaction 5.79 of 7), with reduced manual entry and electronic data transfer earning strong marks, while perceived reduction in sponsor and monitor queries lagged as the one domain below threshold.
What Expanding AI Ecosystems Mean for Sponsor Complexity and Oversight
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, argues that CROs must act as orchestrators rather than aggregators—and that the real test of any AI ecosystem is whether it reduces sponsor coordination burden or just hands it back to them.
Where AI Governance in Clinical Development Falls Short
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, identifies three recurring failure modes in AI governance frameworks—and explains why responsible AI must be an ongoing operating discipline, not a one-time approval gate.