Register Now: Beyond EDC: Designing a Connected Data Strategy for Predictive Clinical Development
Commentary|Videos|February 17, 2026

Real-Time Monitoring and Smarter Site Allocation as Efficiency Drivers

Angela Zubel, chief development officer, Debiopharm, explains how AI-enabled site selection, patient allocation, and real-time data monitoring can reduce costs, shorten timelines, and limit inefficiencies caused by non-performing sites.

In a recent video interview with Applied Clinical Trials, Angela Zubel, chief development officer, Debiopharm, described 2026 as an implementation year for AI and advanced analytics in drug development. She explained that many technologies had moved beyond pilot testing and were ready for broader adoption across clinical operations. Zubel highlighted opportunities to shorten timelines, reduce costs, and improve oversight through real-time monitoring, AI-supported site selection, and predictive analytics for compound prioritization. While acknowledging ongoing limitations in predictive modeling—particularly in oncology—she emphasized the importance of organizational openness to innovation. Sponsors that proactively standardized data, adopted practical AI tools, and experimented responsibly, she noted, were already seeing measurable gains in efficiency and competitiveness.

Editor's note: This transcript is a lightly edited rendering of the original audio/video content. It may contain errors, informal language, or omissions as spoken in the original recording.

ACT: From a clinical trials perspective, where do you see the most meaningful changes in how studies are designed or executed next year?

Zubel: From a clinical trial perspective, I think we’ll see meaningful changes in timelines, cost, and resource allocation if we properly implement the tools that already exist.

For example, site selection, patient allocation, and online monitoring can now happen in real time. Instead of waiting two or three months for data packages, monitoring and data checks can be done continuously.

Another major opportunity is addressing open sites that are not recruiting. Keeping those sites open is a significant cost factor. If we can identify non-performing sites quickly and shift resources to sites more likely to recruit—potentially based on AI recommendations—that would be a major achievement. We lose a lot of time and money maintaining sites that never enroll patients.


Related to this article

© photon_photo - © photon_photo - stock.adobe.com
Standardized measurement across five oncology centers found that clinical research coordinators rated eSource-enabled workflows positively (Overall Mean Satisfaction 5.79 of 7), with reduced manual entry and electronic data transfer earning strong marks, while perceived reduction in sponsor and monitor queries lagged as the one domain below threshold.
Where the Industry Is Headed as Clinical, Operational, and Real-World Data Connect
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, describes the industry’s trajectory toward a unified intelligence orchestration environment—and explains why the future isn’t one model that knows everything, but a trusted system that brings the right evidence to the right human decision.
What Expanding AI Ecosystems Mean for Sponsor Complexity and Oversight
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, argues that CROs must act as orchestrators rather than aggregators—and that the real test of any AI ecosystem is whether it reduces sponsor coordination burden or just hands it back to them.
Where AI Governance in Clinical Development Falls Short
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, identifies three recurring failure modes in AI governance frameworks—and explains why responsible AI must be an ongoing operating discipline, not a one-time approval gate.