Register Now: Beyond EDC: Designing a Connected Data Strategy for Predictive Clinical Development
Commentary|Videos|June 30, 2026

Why Four Regulatory Scenarios Could De-Risk Selective Safety Data Collection

In this video interview, Rob DiCicco, vice president of portfolio management at TransCelerate Biopharma, explains how four jointly developed regulatory scenarios give sponsors a blueprint for adopting selective safety data collection with greater confidence and stronger agency alignment.

Full interview summary

In a recent video interview with Applied Clinical Trials, Rob DiCicco, vice president of portfolio management at TransCelerate Biopharma, discussed the collaborative work underway with FDA and CTTI to explore selective safety data collection as a model for de-risking and modernizing clinical trial design. He opened by highlighting four regulatory scenarios developed across different therapy areas and asset maturity levels, describing them as a blueprint that sponsors can use to identify where this approach might fit within their own portfolios and engage the agency with greater confidence and the right cross-functional representation.

DiCicco pointed to concrete evidence supporting the approach, citing a CTTI white paper that found reductions of 50 to 75% in the number of visits and assessments across three programs using selective safety data collection, with no corresponding loss in data quality. He emphasized that this is not zero safety data collection, but a selective approach applied specifically to mature assets with robust existing safety and efficacy data, where the risk of missing a meaningful signal is low.

He connected the approach directly to the broader push toward decentralized and pragmatic trial designs, arguing that the real value lies not in running a single pragmatic or decentralized trial successfully, but in building the scalability to repeat that success across a sponsor's portfolio. DiCicco also stressed that meaningful progress requires alignment not just between regulators and sponsors, but across a broader ecosystem that includes healthcare practitioners and patient communities, pointing to the ICH E6(R3) update's emphasis on quality by design and stakeholder engagement as a structural opportunity to formalize that collaboration.

He closed with an optimistic outlook on where selective safety data collection could lead, framing it as an entry point into a broader practice of simplification that could ease the operational burden of pragmatic and decentralized trials more broadly, while also helping address a shrinking investigator pool by making trial participation more accessible and sustainable for sites.


Related to this article

Where the Industry Is Headed as Clinical, Operational, and Real-World Data Connect
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, describes the industry’s trajectory toward a unified intelligence orchestration environment—and explains why the future isn’t one model that knows everything, but a trusted system that brings the right evidence to the right human decision.
Building AI Assistants Clinical Trial Teams Can Trust: Q&A with E.K. Koh, Suvoda
In this Q&A, E.K. Koh, chief product officer at Suvoda, discusses what separates a trustworthy AI assistant from one that adds risk, why curated clinical knowledge matters more than general-purpose flexibility, and what safeguards must be in place when assistants move from answering questions to taking actions in clinical trial systems.