
|Articles|October 6, 2021
Syneos Health Acquires RxDataScience
Advertisement
Syneos Health has announced the acquisition of RxDataScience, a healthcare-focused data analytics, data management and artificial intelligence company.
RxDataScience’s product lifecycle solutions include scientific computing for R&D, patient journey, decentralized trials, RWE, predictive analytics and commercial market research. Additionally, RxDataScience offers a consulting-based model providing an iterative approach to develop and deliver analytics solution prototypes in six-to-eight-week sprints.
RxDataScience further scales Syneos Health’s data science abilities, adding capabilities and knowledge in data engineering and management. RxDataScience will be part of the Syneos Health Dynamic Assembly network.
Advertisement
Related to this article

In rare disease drug development where no registry or natural history dataset exists, real-world evidence quality depends on treating evidence engineering as a design-stage decision, defining intended regulatory use and standardizing endpoints, harmonization, and data provenance upfront rather than reconciling gaps after collection.

In this Q&A, Andrea Valente, CEO of uMotif, discusses what it takes to build genuine trust between patients and sites, why making technology easier to use isn't the same as making patient-site interaction more effective, and where the industry is still falling short in its push toward patient-centered trial design.

In today's ACT Brief, we examine why defensible trial data depends on traceability and platform ownership, what CGT site readiness requires as therapy moves to community care, and why data harmonization is AI's primary bottleneck.

Cell and gene therapy access expands into community care settings only when operational coordination, site readiness, and supply chain standardization become first-order priorities equivalent to manufacturing capacity, requiring standardized processes, digital integration, and distributed logistics networks.

In this episode of Beyond Compliance, Otis Johnson, PhD, MPA, founder and principal consultant at Vantix Operations, speaks with Cecilia Xi, PhD, VP of clinical and scientific affairs at Vivalink, about why defensible trial data depends on traceability, platform ownership, and device strategy long after a study ends.

In today's ACT Brief, we examine understanding the patient journey from end to end, whether decentralization reduces site burden or just shifts it, and why nine European drugmakers are sounding urgent alarms.

Decentralized trial models have demonstrated real gains in enrollment performance and patient access, but operational switching costs, fragmented technology stacks, and unresolved gaps in the patient-site relationship raise a question the industry has been slow to confront directly.

In a video interview prior to the 2026 DPHARM conference, Andrea Valente, CEO of uMotif, explains why truly understanding the patient journey from beginning to end—and building that understanding into both study design and data collection tools—remains one of the industry's most important unfinished tasks.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Applied Clinical Trials Online
1
Moving Beyond Disappointing Pilots: Scaling Adoption of AI-Enablement in Drug Development
2
Clinical Site Readiness for Cell and Gene Therapies: Operational and Supply Chain Challenges as they Scale and as they Expand into the Community Care Setting
3
ACT Brief: Data Provenance and Device Strategy, Cell-Gene Therapy Site Readiness, and Data Harmonization Bottleneck
4
When There’s No Registry: Building Rare Disease Evidence That Supports Regulatory Scrutiny
5

