The planned sites in Livonia, Las Vegas, and San Antonio would expand a partnership that places clinical research and health screenings inside Walmart stores.
News|Articles|May 14, 2025
Tufts CSDD CRA-RBQM Transition Study
Tufts CSDD is conducting new research on trends in study monitoring and data collection.
Advertisement
The Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development (Tufts CSDD) is conducting new research aimed at understanding how study monitoring and data collection practices are changing and evolving. This research will assess how sponsor companies are approaching implementation of more centralized and risk-based monitoring approaches, and how sponsor and CRO field-based monitors are adjusting and adapting. Links to participate in this study can be found below:
- Sponsor companies, please click here to participate:
Sponsor Survey
- Clinical research associates (CRAs), please click here to participate:
CRA Survey
For more information, please contact Hana Do (Hana.Do@tufts.edu).
Advertisement
Related to this article
In this video interview, Kent Thoelke, CEO of Paradigm Health, calls for safe harbor protections, CMS reimbursement safeguards, and funding mechanisms modeled on EHR meaningful use to help community and rural institutions participate in research on par with academic centers.
In today’s ACT Brief, we examine why community and rural patients lack access to research as a care option, what makes AI assistants trustworthy in regulated trials, and how FDA draft guidance could let gene editing therapies cover patient-specific variants.
In this Q&A, E.K. Koh, chief product officer at Suvoda, discusses what separates a trustworthy AI assistant from one that adds risk, why curated clinical knowledge matters more than general-purpose flexibility, and what safeguards must be in place when assistants move from answering questions to taking actions in clinical trial systems.
In this video interview, Kent Thoelke, CEO of Paradigm Health, explains why patients in community and rural settings too often lack access to clinical research as a care option, and how closing that gap could improve outcomes and lower long-term costs.
In today’s ACT Brief, we examine why anti-kickback guidance and EHR-integrated trial matching must work together in community settings, why real-time trials depend on mature risk-based quality management, and how pharma is applying digital clones to predict outcomes.
The FDA’s RTCT initiative transmits predefined, clinically meaningful signals to regulators during active trials, so its value depends entirely on the maturity of sponsors’ upstream RBQM signal intelligence, KRIs, QTLs, and root-cause context, rather than on data speed.
In this video interview, Kent Thoelke, CEO of Paradigm Health, outlines why anti-kickback guidance and modern EHR-integrated trial matching technology must work in tandem to reach representative patient populations at the community level.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Applied Clinical Trials Online
1
Building AI Assistants Clinical Trial Teams Can Trust: Q&A with E.K. Koh, Suvoda
2
Real-Time Continuous Trials Through the Lens of Risk-Based Quality Management: Why RBQM Is the Infrastructure RTCT Cannot Exist Without
3
What Needs to Happen Beyond the Clinical Trial Modernization Act
4
Closing the Medical Writing Capacity Gap: Why Training Beats Technology
5