Register Now: Beyond EDC: Designing a Connected Data Strategy for Predictive Clinical Development
Commentary|Podcasts|September 23, 2026

Beyond Compliance: Vivalink's Cecilia Xi, PhD, on Data Provenance and Sustainable Device Strategy in Clinical Trials

In this episode of Beyond Compliance, Otis Johnson, PhD, MPA, founder and principal consultant at Vantix Operations, speaks with Cecilia Xi, PhD, VP of clinical and scientific affairs at Vivalink, about why defensible trial data depends on traceability, platform ownership, and device strategy long after a study ends.

In this episode of Beyond Compliance, host Otis Johnson, PhD, MPA, founder and principal consultant at Vantix Operations, talks with Cecilia Xi, PhD, VP of clinical and scientific affairs at Vivalink, about what it takes for clinical trial data to remain traceable, reproducible, and defensible years after collection.

Xi explains that strong data provenance requires integrity across both time and space, tracking not just when data was collected but how it moved from raw device output to final dataset, with clear logging of any missing data or imputations. She contrasts this with traditional site-based measurements, noting that connected devices generate far greater data volume and noise, requiring automated auditing methods rather than manual review. Xi also stresses that sponsors cannot outsource accountability for their data, even when platforms and vendors do the collecting, making early data repository transfer essential to avoid loss if a vendor relationship ends.

The conversation turns to sustainability, where Xi describes how reusable, clinical-grade devices can sharply reduce operational waste compared to disposables, provided sponsors manage device service life, calibration, and consistent training across patients and sites. She closes by outlining what sponsors should evaluate in technology partners, from regulatory clearance and financial stability to encryption, non-proprietary data formats, and API access, and urges a shift from reactive compliance to treating trial data as a proactive, quality-driven scientific asset.

Key takeaways

  • Strong data provenance requires integrity both temporally and spatially, meaning traceable timestamps, sources, and documented transformations from raw device data through to the final dataset.
  • Continuous data from connected devices generates far greater volume and noise than traditional site-based measurements, making manual auditing impossible and requiring automated verification methods.
  • Sponsors should secure their own data repository soon after study completion, since losing platform ownership or control can mean losing access to historical data if a vendor relationship ends.
  • Reusable, clinical-grade devices can significantly cut operational waste compared to disposables, but require managing service-life expiration, recalibration, and consistent training across patients and sites to maintain data quality.

Related to this article

© photon_photo - © photon_photo - stock.adobe.com
Standardized measurement across five oncology centers found that clinical research coordinators rated eSource-enabled workflows positively (Overall Mean Satisfaction 5.79 of 7), with reduced manual entry and electronic data transfer earning strong marks, while perceived reduction in sponsor and monitor queries lagged as the one domain below threshold.
Where the Industry Is Headed as Clinical, Operational, and Real-World Data Connect
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, describes the industry’s trajectory toward a unified intelligence orchestration environment—and explains why the future isn’t one model that knows everything, but a trusted system that brings the right evidence to the right human decision.
Building AI Assistants Clinical Trial Teams Can Trust: Q&A with E.K. Koh, Suvoda
In this Q&A, E.K. Koh, chief product officer at Suvoda, discusses what separates a trustworthy AI assistant from one that adds risk, why curated clinical knowledge matters more than general-purpose flexibility, and what safeguards must be in place when assistants move from answering questions to taking actions in clinical trial systems.