Most AI pilots in drug development fail not from poor technology but from lack of strategic prioritization, organizational readiness, integrated data infrastructure, and disciplined governance, making success dependent on business discipline rather than technical capability.
The company that modernized how clinical research reaches underserved communities is back at DPHARM with a new platform built to revolutionize how pharmaceutical companies understand and act on community data
In a video interview prior to the 2026 DPHARM conference, Andrea Valente, CEO of uMotif, explains why the real technology challenge isn't usability alone—it's making it easier for patients and sites to interact more effectively with each other.
In today's ACT Brief, we examine what patient-site relationships need most at DPHARM, how platform-based AI scales across workflows, and FDA's approval of a gene therapy for a rare childhood syndrome.
In a video interview prior to the 2026 DPHARM conference, Andrea Valente, CEO of uMotif, shares what she expects to be at the center of the conversation—from building trust between patients and sites to where AI may and may not have a role in that relationship.
A platform-based approach connects AI across workflows, data and governance, helping life sciences organizations move from isolated wins to real scale.
In today's ACT Brief, we examine what genuine patient voice requires beyond buzzwords, why AI's next bottleneck is system integration not models, and how regulators across three jurisdictions are formalizing patient input requirements.
The clinical research industry talks about patient-centeredness constantly but embeds it too late, too narrowly, and without clear ownership, and the cost shows up in enrollment failures, protocol deviations, and outcomes that don't reflect what patients actually care about.
Why clinical development’s next AI bottleneck is not the model, but the system around it.
In today's ACT Brief, we examine FDA's expedited pathway for first-in-human trials, why operating model design matters more than sourcing strategy, and how early readiness signals predict trial risk.
The pilot pairs drug sponsors with qualified research institutions to compress the path from drug identification to first-in-human study through rolling submission review and earlier coordination of institutional review board and site activation activities.
A Syneos Health-announced study from Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development finds no single sourcing model consistently outperforms others, pointing instead to vendor coordination, governance, and fit-for-purpose design as the real performance drivers.
Regulatory expectations for patient input in drug development have shifted from aspiration to documented methodology across three major jurisdictions.
This episode of The Human Side of Clinical Trials, hosted by Brian S. McGowan, PhD, FACEHP, chief learning officer and co-founder of ArcheMedX, Inc., and Kelly Ritch, chief operating officer of ArcheMedX, Inc., explores why training completion metrics like attendance and quiz scores fail to capture true study readiness, and how measuring both competence and confidence can reveal trial risks before enrollment even begins.
In this video interview, Amélie Lothe, global medical community head for rare epilepsies at UCB Pharma, outlines what it takes to move beyond transactional engagement and treat patient advocacy organizations as long-term partners in the science and the care.
In today's ACT Brief, we examine what families with rare epilepsy teach about trial feasibility, how preclinical CRO partnerships are evolving beyond transactional services, and why cortisol dysregulation limits GLP-1 effectiveness in diabetes.
As the life sciences industry continues to evolve, the ability to effectively manage and leverage preclinical CRO partnerships is set to become a defining characteristic of successful biopharma companies.
In this video interview, Amélie Lothe, global medical community head for rare epilepsies at UCB Pharma, shares what she has learned firsthand from families living with Dravet syndrome and CDKL5 deficiency disorder about what makes trial participation possible—and what makes it not.
In today's ACT Brief, we examine how shifting patient engagement to endpoint selection improves trial data quality, why execution infrastructure must precede AI deployment, and addressing missing baseline data in real-world oncology research.
Clinical trials have spent decades perfecting data capture, but the execution layer underneath it, including decision workflows, data collection design, and lab connectivity, remains fragmented in ways that limit what AI can realistically deliver and that quietly compromise the scientific validity of the data itself.
In this video interview, Amélie Lothe, global medical community head for rare epilepsies at UCB Pharma, describes how shifting patient engagement from protocol review to endpoint selection transforms both the quality of trial data and the experience of participation.
In today's ACT Brief, we examine why seizure reduction misses what families want from epilepsy trials, how lab coordination requires connecting data to intent, and why healthcare needs orchestration rather than more tools.
True lab orchestration isn't about coordinating instruments, it's about connecting scientific intent, data, and decisions across the entire research lifecycle.
In this video interview, Amélie Lothe, global medical community head for rare epilepsies at UCB Pharma, explains why the full burden of developmental and epileptic encephalopathies extends far beyond clinical symptoms—and why endpoints must reflect what families are actually hoping for.
In today's ACT Brief, we examine genuine patient partnership in trial design, how AI enables informed recruitment while preserving clinician relationships, and moving patient engagement beyond performative gestures.
In this Q&A, John Worden, chief commercial officer at Javara, discusses why clinical trial recruitment has remained stubbornly one-size-fits-all, how AI can identify patients at scale without displacing the clinician relationships that drive trust, and what care-integrated research engagement needs to look like for health systems, sponsors, and sites.
In this video interview, Amélie Lothe, global medical community head for rare epilepsies at UCB Pharma, explains why genuine patient partnership begins before the protocol is written—and what it looks like when patients and caregivers tell you a trial was designed with them in mind.
In today's ACT Brief, we examine why black-box AI fails in clinical trials, how participant understanding drives engagement more than gamification, and FDA permanent leadership appointments prioritizing regulatory predictability.
Participant engagement depends more on clarity and understanding than on gamification or incentives, requiring engagement embedded into trial workflows as a core design component rather than a peripheral consideration
In this episode of Beyond Compliance, Otis Johnson, PhD, MPA, founder and principal consultant at Vantix Operations, speaks with Joseph Geraci, PhD, co-founder and chief scientific and technical officer at NetraMark, about why explainable AI, not black-box prediction, is needed to reveal clinically meaningful patient subgroups in regulated drug development.
