Feature|Articles|August 13, 2026

Data Quality Across the Clinical Trial Lifecycle: What It Takes to Fully Trust Your Data

From point-of-care sample collection to real-world data curation, wearable device integration, and continuous review infrastructure, data quality is not a single problem in clinical trials—it is a layered challenge that manifests differently at every stage of development and demands a different set of solutions at each one.

Clinical trial modernization is moving fast, but the foundational problem has not changed: data quality remains the ceiling on everything else the industry is trying to build. Artificial intelligence, real-time oversight, and real-world evidence all depend on data that is accurate, complete, and trustworthy from the moment it is collected. That condition is still far from guaranteed across most of the clinical trial ecosystem.

Related to this article

Building AI Assistants Clinical Trial Teams Can Trust: Q&A with E.K. Koh, Suvoda
In this Q&A, E.K. Koh, chief product officer at Suvoda, discusses what separates a trustworthy AI assistant from one that adds risk, why curated clinical knowledge matters more than general-purpose flexibility, and what safeguards must be in place when assistants move from answering questions to taking actions in clinical trial systems.
© photon_photo - © photon_photo - stock.adobe.com
Standardized measurement across five oncology centers found that clinical research coordinators rated eSource-enabled workflows positively (Overall Mean Satisfaction 5.79 of 7), with reduced manual entry and electronic data transfer earning strong marks, while perceived reduction in sponsor and monitor queries lagged as the one domain below threshold.