|Articles|April 22, 2021

FDA Unveils Extensive Manufacturing Violations at Emergent

FDA officials have taken the unusual step of issuing the closeout report (form 483) on its just-completed re-inspection of Emergent BioSolutions’ Baltimore manufacturing facility.

Just in case anyone suspected FDA of over-reacting to problems at this troubled vaccine production site—or that any poor quality materials could be released—FDA officials have taken the unusual step of issuing the closeout report (form 483) on its just-completed re-inspection of Emergent BioSolutions’ Baltimore manufacturing facility. The report cites multiple ongoing violations that undermine assurance of quality in products from this plant and the need for a continuing “pause” in production.

FDA acting commissioner Janet Woodcock and Peter Marks, director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), issued a forceful statement emphasizing the importance of thorough FDA inspections and review of quality procedures to ensure product quality.1 These FDA leaders aim to reassure the public that no vaccine will be released from the Emergent facility until FDA can assure it meets standards.

FDA inspectors found violations in last week’s inspection raise the risk of product cross-contamination and unsanitary conditions, specifically citing improper cleaning, lack of written procedures, faulty handling of raw materials and containers, and inadequate employee training to perform required job functions.2 And these are many of the same issues cited in by FDA inspectors in previous site visits, indicating that Emergent has failed to address multiple ongoing problems.

The situation now has drawn attention on Capitol Hill. Leaders of the House Oversight & Reform Committee and its Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis have opened an investigation into how Emergent lobbying and political connections may have influenced continued funding for vaccine manufacturing, despite ongoing regulatory issues.3

Woodcock and Marks emphasize that they are “doing everything we can” to ensure that COVID-19 vaccines for Americans meet FDA’s high standards for quality, safety and effectiveness. The result, they hope, is that FDA will maintain the public’s trust in its operations.

References

  1. https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USFDA/bulletins/2ce64ec
  2. https://www.fda.gov/media/147762/download?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery
  3. https://coronavirus.house.gov/news/press-releases/maloney-and-clyburn-launch-investigation-emergent-biosolutions-profits-and

Related to this article

© photon_photo - © photon_photo - stock.adobe.com
Standardized measurement across five oncology centers found that clinical research coordinators rated eSource-enabled workflows positively (Overall Mean Satisfaction 5.79 of 7), with reduced manual entry and electronic data transfer earning strong marks, while perceived reduction in sponsor and monitor queries lagged as the one domain below threshold.
Where the Industry Is Headed as Clinical, Operational, and Real-World Data Connect
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, describes the industry’s trajectory toward a unified intelligence orchestration environment—and explains why the future isn’t one model that knows everything, but a trusted system that brings the right evidence to the right human decision.
What Expanding AI Ecosystems Mean for Sponsor Complexity and Oversight
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, argues that CROs must act as orchestrators rather than aggregators—and that the real test of any AI ecosystem is whether it reduces sponsor coordination burden or just hands it back to them.