Register Now: Beyond EDC: Designing a Connected Data Strategy for Predictive Clinical Development
|Articles|November 20, 2017

Industry-Sponsored Phase III Clinical Trial Activity

Published data indicate the size and complexity of these Phase III studies has hardly changed over the last few years.

R&D spending, according to a number of sources, continues to grow as biopharmaceutical solutions become integral to a wider range of medical maladies. Phase III clinical trials represent the critical data foundation in the new drug approval process for regulatory authorities around the world. Published data indicate the size and complexity of these Phase III studies has hardly changed over the last few years. Despite some assertions about a growing number of clinical trials, there are no data, which can be verified by third parties, supporting these assertions. In fact, one of the most widely accepted sources of data on clinical trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, points to an opposite conclusion.

ClinicalTrials.gov is a federal database, mandated since 2007 for all organizations conducting studies under FDA auspices. Missing data for any of the variables is often close to zero, and rarely exceeds three percent. ClinicalTrials.gov has become a widely used tool by drug development professionals and a frequently cited data source for research publications.

The randomized clinical trial (RCT) model has come under stress as the requirements of conducting RCTs became more demanding. As therapies become more targeted though, the financial calculus might very well make these RCTs even more problematic. Yet to date, the number of industry sponsored Phase III clinical trials continues unchanged. The slight drop in the 2016 reflects a slight lag in reporting. 

 

Number of Industry Sponsored Phase III Opened in Each Year

Year

2014

2015

2016

Worldwide

892

902

808

United States

505

561

487

 

 

 


Related to this article

© photon_photo - © photon_photo - stock.adobe.com
Standardized measurement across five oncology centers found that clinical research coordinators rated eSource-enabled workflows positively (Overall Mean Satisfaction 5.79 of 7), with reduced manual entry and electronic data transfer earning strong marks, while perceived reduction in sponsor and monitor queries lagged as the one domain below threshold.
The Human Side of Clinical Trials: Why Fuzzy Mental Models Undermine Clinical Trial Execution
In Episode 3 of The Human Side of Clinical Trials, hosts Brian S. McGowan, PhD, FACEHP, chief learning officer and co-founder of ArcheMedX, Inc., and Kelly Ritch, chief operating officer of ArcheMedX, Inc., speak with Jason Riis, PhD, CEO and chief behavioral scientist at Behavioralize, about why a well-written protocol doesn’t always translate into consistent execution, and how designing for the way people actually think and learn can reduce site burden and the need for costly unlearning.