Register Now: Beyond EDC: Designing a Connected Data Strategy for Predictive Clinical Development
Commentary|Videos|August 14, 2024

Integrating Clinical Technology

In part 2 of this video interview, Melissa Easy, VP commercial, digital products & solutions, IQVIA discusses how advancements in technology are creating challenges with integration and how they can be addressed.

ACT: What are some challenges you are currently seeing with the integration of clinical technology?

Easy: That is a huge issue because clinical technology just continues to proliferate, so whilst we keep adding such a variety of different tech stacks—every time we do, it means more integrations are needed, because, again, it should be about the user experience being seamless and not burdensome. It's interesting, because there's a stat that comes to mind; around since 2010, so a little while ago now, the global R&D spending on CROs and technology vendors has beyond doubled. However, it’s not making trials faster, we're actually now seeing longer study timelines than ever before, and I think this speaks to some of the integrations around technology and some of the challenges. Even when we start to think about integrations, like how we're adding AI (artificial intelligence), we do have the ability to transform what we're doing, but because of some of the regulatory issues that we have, I do find that that some of these integration and all the various products because of our distinct needs in the life sciences space around privacy, precision, and transparency, this all adds up to the challenges of integrations. When we think that each sponsor chooses a different ecosystem, and each site works with more than one sponsor, this is why this is such a challenge that we're seeing.

For me, I think it's really important that we as an industry start to think about solutions here. There is something that we've been working on at IQVIA. I won’t do a sales pitch, but we call it One Home for Sites. The goal here is to bring all of these technologies together, so from a science perspective, it doesn't matter which CRO, it doesn't matter which vendor, they can enter a study regardless, through one place. That's something that we've been working on with many partners, I'm very excited about, and happy to talk to anyone that wants to learn more.


Related to this article

Where the Industry Is Headed as Clinical, Operational, and Real-World Data Connect
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, describes the industry’s trajectory toward a unified intelligence orchestration environment—and explains why the future isn’t one model that knows everything, but a trusted system that brings the right evidence to the right human decision.
What Expanding AI Ecosystems Mean for Sponsor Complexity and Oversight
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, argues that CROs must act as orchestrators rather than aggregators—and that the real test of any AI ecosystem is whether it reduces sponsor coordination burden or just hands it back to them.
Where AI Governance in Clinical Development Falls Short
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, identifies three recurring failure modes in AI governance frameworks—and explains why responsible AI must be an ongoing operating discipline, not a one-time approval gate.
© photon_photo - © photon_photo - stock.adobe.com
Standardized measurement across five oncology centers found that clinical research coordinators rated eSource-enabled workflows positively (Overall Mean Satisfaction 5.79 of 7), with reduced manual entry and electronic data transfer earning strong marks, while perceived reduction in sponsor and monitor queries lagged as the one domain below threshold.