Key Takeaways
- Subcutaneous Autoinjector Matches Intravenous (IV) Efficacy and Safety: Weekly 360 mg subcutaneous (SC) Leqembi maintained similar clinical and biomarker outcomes as biweekly IV dosing in patients with early Alzheimer disease (AD).
- Lower Infusion Reaction Risk: SC dosing showed a <1% rate of systemic injection/infusion reactions compared to 26% with IV, with no amyloid-related imaging abnormalities-edema cases reported.
- High Usability and Patient Support: Over 95% of study participants, including patients and caregivers, found the autoinjector easy to use and welcomed its potential for at-home administration.
Results from the Phase III Clarity AD open-label extension (OLE) trial (NCT03887455) showed that weekly 360 mg subcutaneous autoinjector (SC-AI) dosing of Eisai and Biogen’s Leqembi (lecanemab-irmb) maintained comparable efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and biomarker outcomes to the standard biweekly 10 mg/kg intravenous (IV) regimen in patients with early Alzheimer disease (AD). According to Biogen, the findings also demonstrated a favorable safety profile and high user acceptability, underscoring the SC-AI’s potential to improve treatment adherence and reduce the care burden for patients and caregivers.1
Can a Subcutaneous Option for Leqembi Maintain the Same Benefits as IV Infusion?
Clarity ADTrial Background and Design
- The placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, 18-month Clarity AD trial evaluated the efficacy of Leqembi in 1,906 patients with early-stage AD.
- In the OLE phase, the trial evaluated the long-term safety and tolerability of Leqembi and whether its long-term effects as measured by the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) at the end of the core study were maintained over time.
- The dual primary endpoints of the OLE were the number of patients reporting one or more treatment-related adverse events (AEs) and a change from core study baseline in CDR-SB.2
Key Findings on SC-AI Efficacy and Safety
- Results showed that the SC-AI form of Leqembi demonstrated a <1% rate of systemic injection or infusion reactions compared to 26% in the IV group.
- Clinical and biomarker responses—including measures such as CDR-SB, amyloid PET, and plasma biomarkers—were consistent between SC and IV dosing arms.
- Notably, no cases of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities-edema were observed among patients on the 360 mg weekly SC maintenance dose.
Usability Studies Support Home-Based Administration
To ensure the safe and effective use of the SC-AI, Eisai conducted additional usability and tolerability studies. A human factors study with 110 participants—including early AD patients, and healthcare professionals—found that 95% were able to successfully administer the SC-AI dose. In a separate acceptability study involving 126 participants, more than 95% reported the device was easy to use, convenient, and feasible for administration, even in a home setting. Participants expressed high satisfaction, with all patients indicating support for the SC-AI’s introduction.1