|Articles|June 7, 2021

Applied Clinical Trials

  • Applied Clinical Trials-06-01-2021
  • Volume 30
  • Issue 6

The Tangled Web of Large Outsourced Providers

A brief look at the market for mergers and acquisitions since the year of COVID.

CROs, as an industry, appear to be in a period of change. The overall market for mergers and acquisitions since the year of COVID have needles moving in various directions. Let’s dial those in.

First up is largest financial transaction, Thermo Fisher’s acquisition of PPD, worth $17.4 billion, which should close in the third quarter. Thermo Fisher has long eyed its importance to the clinical trials space because of its manufacturing capabilities around APIs and clinical trial supplies. It, like others, jumped on the decentralized trials bandwagon in late October through its Direct-to-Patient service offering bringing those medications directly to the patient. The acquisition of PPD grows its clinical trials scope, as well as nests its existing manufacturing customers with an extended value proposition in the services chain.

Two additional M&As worth mentioning are the Syneos acquisition of CRO Synteract for $400 million in late October. This acquisition calls for the former to leverage the latter’s small-to-midsize biopharma client base. The second is ICON’s $12 billion purchase of PRA Health Sciences in February. That acquisition elevates the number fifth and sixth largest CROs to the second spot, behind IQVIA. The ICON/PRA merger also plans to capitalize on the decentralized trials movement through its mobile technologies and site platform network.

Meanwhile, in mid-May, mid-size CRO Premier Research acquired Camargo Pharmaceutical Services. Camargo will allow Premier to leverage its focus on emerging biopharma’s needs for rare disease and complex development programs, as well as the accelerated approval pathways more common among smaller biopharma.

What trends can we untangle from these transactions? The CMO/CDMO space is looking to capitalize on the needed manufacturing capabilities for vaccines and biologics that are more prevalent in the drug development landscape by offering those services as part of their portfolios. Not since the transformation of the INC Research and inVentiv Health to Syneos Health and the IMS/Quintiles to IQVIA for an extended clinical research-to-commercialization chain has a market extended its horizontal reach to existing customers.

We can infer that that the attraction to emerging, small and midsize biopharma clients will continue to be a focus for the expertise in clinical operations, regulatory, decentralized trials, and manufacturing they require. What does that mean for clinops professionals? Not so much day-to-day, but an understanding of the bigger picture regarding the needs of smaller sponsors is vital.

Lisa Henderson is Editor-in-Chief of Applied Clinical Trials. She can be reached at [email protected].


Related to this article

Recruitment in the Age of AI: Q&A with John Worden, Javara
In this Q&A, John Worden, chief commercial officer at Javara, discusses why clinical trial recruitment has remained stubbornly one-size-fits-all, how AI can identify patients at scale without displacing the clinician relationships that drive trust, and what care-integrated research engagement needs to look like for health systems, sponsors, and sites.
What This Study Means for Sponsors Still Struggling to Justify RBQM at Scale
In this video interview, Sylviane de Viron of CluePoints and Abigail Dirks of Tufts CSDD explain how ICH E6(R3) and new empirical evidence of RBQM's net financial impact give sponsors the tools they need to build the multi-functional buy-in required for successful adoption—and why RBQM only delivers full value when it replaces, not supplements, traditional monitoring.