News|Podcasts|May 28, 2026

ACT Brief: eCOA Costs and Paper Persistence, Early Phase Statistical Foundations, and DEI Progress in Trials

In today's ACT Brief, we examine why paper-based outcome assessments persist despite clear data-quality disadvantages, why early phase statistical decisions shape entire development pathways, and the structural changes needed for representative enrollment.

This is the Applied Clinical Trials Brief—your fast track to the latest insights shaping clinical operations and drug development.

  • In a new column, EAB member Scottie Kern of the eCOA Consortium explored why paper-based clinical outcome assessments remain in use despite ALCOA++ advantages with eCOA. Cost visibility creates asymmetry—eCOA fees are explicit while paper's hidden costs in monitoring, SDV, transcription, and regulatory risk remain diffuse. Small studies, rapid country activation, and regional infrastructure gaps create genuine exceptions where paper economics are hard to justify, though panelists agreed eCOA is preferable in most circumstances.
  • In the fifth and final part of her video interview, Sam Hinsley of Phastar explained why early phase statistical decisions form the foundation of entire development pathways and what is at stake when those critical choices are made on limited data.
  • In our latest FAQ article, despite political headwinds, life sciences leaders are maintaining DEI commitments but translating that into representative enrollment requires structural changes to protocol design, site selection, and community engagement that most of the industry has yet to fully implement.

That's all for today's ACT Brief. Join us tomorrow for more updates shaping clinical operations and drug development. Thanks for listening.


Related to this article

The Human Side of Clinical Trials: How Measuring Readiness at Training Predicts Trial Risk Before It Shows Up in the Data
This episode of The Human Side of Clinical Trials, hosted by Brian S. McGowan, PhD, FACEHP, chief learning officer and co-founder of ArcheMedX, Inc., and Kelly Ritch, chief operating officer of ArcheMedX, Inc., explores why training completion metrics like attendance and quiz scores fail to capture true study readiness, and how measuring both competence and confidence can reveal trial risks before enrollment even begins.