Register Now - Beyond Recruitment: The Future of Patient Site Engagement in Oncology Clinical Trials
|Webcasts|August 18, 2020

Information Systems in Clinical Trials: Pragmatic Validation of EDC Systems

Author(s)Elsevier

Join us as we explore system validation with Will Crocombe from RISG Consulting, and share practical ways to address change overload and survive a visit from the inspectors. Live: Thursday, Sept. 17, 2020 at 11am EDT| 8am PDT| 4pm BST| 5pm CEST On demand available after airing until Sept. 17, 2021.

Register free: https://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/act_s/edc_systems

Event Overview:

Computer System Validation is a key regulatory requirement and one which challenges the understanding and resources of many research organizations. Achieving the validated state means managing an ever-changing environment of servers, operating systems, EDC software, security patches etc, some or all of which may be outside the direct control of the organization. And all this needs considering before you have even started developing your study database.

GCP expects a risk-proportionate approach, but how can this be approached, pragmatically?

During this webcast we’ll explore the scope of EDC system validation and offer practical ways of dealing with change overload and surviving a visit from the inspectors.

Key Learning Objectives:

Join us for this webcast to:

  • Understand the scope of system validation and the challenges this brings
  • Discover an approach to unpicking the complexity
  • Have an opportunity to discuss practical solutions

Speakers: Will Crocombe, Director, RISG Consulting, UK

Oli Cram, Macro General Manager, Elsevier

Time and date: Thursday, Sept. 17, 2020 at 11am EDT| 8am PDT| 4pm BST| 5pm CEST

On demand available after airing until Sept. 17, 2021.

Sponsor: Elsevier

Register free: https://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/act_s/edc_systems


Related to this article

© Grispb - © Grispb - stock.adobe.com
Mistral and OpenAI produced identical overall eligibility labels across 200 synthetic patient-study assessments, with criterion-level disagreements concentrated in inclusion criteria where models switch between “Uncertain” and “Not included” when records lack sufficient evidence, so model choice should be driven by deployment architecture, control, and cost rather than assumed interchangeability.
The Human Side of Clinical Trials: Before Burden Becomes Risk, Capturing Friction in Real Time
In Episode 4 of The Human Side of Clinical Trials, host Brian S. McGowan, PhD, FACEHP, chief learning officer and co-founder of ArcheMedX, Inc., speaks with Jason Riis, PhD, CEO and chief behavioral scientist at Behavioralize, about how capturing friction closer to the moment it happens can reveal unclear instructions, technology friction, and workarounds that retrospective surveys and debriefs tend to miss.