In today's ACT Brief, we examine the FDA's multi-domain transparency priorities, why radiopharmaceutical trials need redesigned infrastructure, and how AI can make enrollment more predictable.
News|Articles|January 22, 2026
Phase I Clinical Pharmacology Services from Quotient Sciences
Author(s)Quotient Sciences
Quotient Sciences is dedicated to Phase I trials and early drug development, providing the insights you need by offering comprehensive clinical pharmacology services for all Phase I study programs. Our services encompass expert clinical study design, thorough data analysis, and detailed reporting. With our fully integrated approach, we ensure seamless execution and deliver high-quality results safely and quickly.
Related to this article
Radiopharmaceutical therapy is exposing a broader challenge for clinical development: scientific innovation can advance only as fast as the infrastructure, data, and cross-functional decisions required to deliver it.
A new FDA Voices post from the agency's acting chief of staff details completed milestones and upcoming priorities across complete response letter disclosure, application lifecycle transparency, new approach methodologies, labeling, and inspectional records.
In today's ACT Brief, we examine FDA input sought on early-phase ibogaine protocols, why mixed outsourcing models spread faster than oversight infrastructure, and a major partnership for a rare kidney disease treatment.
Mixed FSP and FSO models are gaining ground as sponsors seek agility and resource flexibility, but the oversight infrastructure, audit trails, and accountability structures needed to run them well and survive regulatory inspection are consistently lagging behind the model itself.
A new request for information asks for comments on dose selection, safety monitoring, eligibility criteria, and oversight approaches to support the responsible development of ibogaine drug products.
In today's ACT Brief, we examine practical guidance for clinical operations teams beginning AI adoption, how hierarchical endpoints better reflect treatment benefit, and why early-stage program failures signal smarter pipeline management.
Hierarchical composite endpoints analyzed through pairwise comparisons more accurately reflect multifaceted treatment benefit than time-to-first-event composites, but transparent outcome prioritization, patient involvement in ranking, and reporting of Net Treatment Benefit remain underutilized despite their importance to interpretation.
Trending on Applied Clinical Trials Online
1
FDA Seeks Public Input on Early-Phase Clinical Trial Design for Ibogaine
2
FDA Releases Transparency Roadmap Outlining Disclosure Priorities Across Drug Development and Regulatory Review
3
Mixed Outsourcing Models Are Spreading. Is Sponsor Oversight Keeping Up?
4
Beyond the Molecule: Why Radiopharmaceutical Trials Require a New Operating Model
5