News|Podcasts|June 2, 2026

ACT Brief: Process Architecture Over Autonomous AI, Real-Time RWE Integration, and Building RWE Infrastructure

In today's ACT Brief, we examine why process architecture matters more than autonomous agentic AI, shifting RWE from post-approval to concurrent validation, and organizational capabilities needed for effective RWE use.

This is the Applied Clinical Trials Brief—your fast track to the latest insights shaping clinical operations and drug development.

  • In part three of his video interview, Abraham Gutman shared key takeaways from a presentation he gave at SCOPE X, including a pointed caution against the idea that agentic AI can run clinical trials autonomously. Gutman emphasized that process architecture is the real entry point for AI to deliver on its promise, not autonomous decision-making.
  • In a new contributed article, Christopher Boone of Oracle examined how real-world evidence is shifting from a post-market footnote to concurrent validation running alongside trial data. Organizations furthest along have built unified data environments integrating EHRs, claims, and patient-reported outcomes as complementary inputs into a single evidentiary framework, enabling early signal detection rather than late-stage course corrections.
  • In a new FAQ article, as the FDA formally recognizes RWE as eligible confirmatory evidence, sponsors face growing imperative to build data infrastructure and analytical capabilities for effective RWE use across the development lifecycle. The concurrent validation model fundamentally changes the nature of regulatory conversations by stress-testing evidence from multiple directions before approval.

That's all for today's ACT Brief. Join us tomorrow for more updates shaping clinical operations and drug development. Thanks for listening.


Related to this article

The Human Side of Clinical Trials: How Measuring Readiness at Training Predicts Trial Risk Before It Shows Up in the Data
This episode of The Human Side of Clinical Trials, hosted by Brian S. McGowan, PhD, FACEHP, chief learning officer and co-founder of ArcheMedX, Inc., and Kelly Ritch, chief operating officer of ArcheMedX, Inc., explores why training completion metrics like attendance and quiz scores fail to capture true study readiness, and how measuring both competence and confidence can reveal trial risks before enrollment even begins.