In today’s ACT Brief, we examine what changes when AI is embedded across clinical operations, why faster trial data isn’t yet producing faster decisions, and how FDA granted accelerated approval to a therapy for a rare airway disease.
News|Articles|July 30, 2024
The Clinical Trial Quality Checklist
Author(s)YPrime
Do you leverage a quality-first mindset as you evaluate clinical trial technology? When you evaluate eCOA and IRT solutions, quality cannot be ignored, as choosing poorly can lead to data integrity issues, regulatory roadblocks, and costly delays that can postpone potentially lifesaving treatments. How can you ensure your clinical trial technology partner prioritizes quality throughout the clinical research journey? This checklist is your guide to choosing a quality-first solution.
Related to this article
Data capture is no longer the bottleneck, and whether the lag between a signal and a decision shrinks depends on signal design, AI governance, and vendor orchestration.
In this Q&A, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, discusses what changes when AI is embedded across protocol strategy, data infrastructure, and workflow tools at once, where governance frameworks tend to fall short, and why CROs must orchestrate AI ecosystems rather than simply aggregate them.
In today’s ACT Brief, we examine what policy changes would help community and rural institutions join research, how Walmart is expanding clinical trial centers into three more states, and how FDA approved Ilumya for adults with active psoriatic arthritis.
The planned sites in Livonia, Las Vegas, and San Antonio would expand a partnership that places clinical research and health screenings inside Walmart stores.
In this video interview, Kent Thoelke, CEO of Paradigm Health, calls for safe harbor protections, CMS reimbursement safeguards, and funding mechanisms modeled on EHR meaningful use to help community and rural institutions participate in research on par with academic centers.
In today’s ACT Brief, we examine why community and rural patients lack access to research as a care option, what makes AI assistants trustworthy in regulated trials, and how FDA draft guidance could let gene editing therapies cover patient-specific variants.
In this Q&A, E.K. Koh, chief product officer at Suvoda, discusses what separates a trustworthy AI assistant from one that adds risk, why curated clinical knowledge matters more than general-purpose flexibility, and what safeguards must be in place when assistants move from answering questions to taking actions in clinical trial systems.
Trending on Applied Clinical Trials Online
1
From Signal to Action: Why Faster Trial Data Isn’t Producing Faster Decisions
2
Embedding AI Across the Clinical Operating Model: Q&A with Rajneesh Patil, Syneos Health
3
Walmart and Care Access Plan Three More Clinical Trial Centers in Michigan, Nevada, and Texas
4
ACT Brief: Embedding AI Across Operations, Faster Trial Decisions, and Voceryq Approval
5