News

In this video interview, Amélie Lothe, global medical community head for rare epilepsies at UCB Pharma, shares what she has learned firsthand from families living with Dravet syndrome and CDKL5 deficiency disorder about what makes trial participation possible—and what makes it not.

In today's ACT Brief, we examine how shifting patient engagement to endpoint selection improves trial data quality, why execution infrastructure must precede AI deployment, and addressing missing baseline data in real-world oncology research.

Clinical trials have spent decades perfecting data capture, but the execution layer underneath it, including decision workflows, data collection design, and lab connectivity, remains fragmented in ways that limit what AI can realistically deliver and that quietly compromise the scientific validity of the data itself.

In this video interview, Amélie Lothe, global medical community head for rare epilepsies at UCB Pharma, describes how shifting patient engagement from protocol review to endpoint selection transforms both the quality of trial data and the experience of participation.

In today's ACT Brief, we examine why seizure reduction misses what families want from epilepsy trials, how lab coordination requires connecting data to intent, and why healthcare needs orchestration rather than more tools.

True lab orchestration isn't about coordinating instruments, it's about connecting scientific intent, data, and decisions across the entire research lifecycle.

In this video interview, Amélie Lothe, global medical community head for rare epilepsies at UCB Pharma, explains why the full burden of developmental and epileptic encephalopathies extends far beyond clinical symptoms—and why endpoints must reflect what families are actually hoping for.

In today's ACT Brief, we examine genuine patient partnership in trial design, how AI enables informed recruitment while preserving clinician relationships, and moving patient engagement beyond performative gestures.

In this Q&A, John Worden, chief commercial officer at Javara, discusses why clinical trial recruitment has remained stubbornly one-size-fits-all, how AI can identify patients at scale without displacing the clinician relationships that drive trust, and what care-integrated research engagement needs to look like for health systems, sponsors, and sites.

In today's ACT Brief, we examine why black-box AI fails in clinical trials, how participant understanding drives engagement more than gamification, and FDA permanent leadership appointments prioritizing regulatory predictability.

Participant engagement depends more on clarity and understanding than on gamification or incentives, requiring engagement embedded into trial workflows as a core design component rather than a peripheral consideration

In this episode of Beyond Compliance, Otis Johnson, PhD, MPA, founder and principal consultant at Vantix Operations, speaks with Joseph Geraci, PhD, co-founder and chief scientific and technical officer at NetraMark, about why explainable AI, not black-box prediction, is needed to reveal clinically meaningful patient subgroups in regulated drug development.

In today's ACT Brief, we examine how regulatory guidance and financial evidence enable RBQM adoption, why site payment performance remains a competitive differentiator, and a collaboration advancing an inhaled approach to cystic fibrosis.

In this Q&A, Patrick Mizer, chief technology officer at Ledger Run, discusses how payment reliability has become a competitive differentiator in site selection, why decades of disconnected workflows have made payment inconsistency a structural problem, and where AI is delivering real value in the high-friction parts of clinical trial payments.

In this video interview, Sylviane de Viron of CluePoints and Abigail Dirks of Tufts CSDD explain how ICH E6(R3) and new empirical evidence of RBQM's net financial impact give sponsors the tools they need to build the multi-functional buy-in required for successful adoption—and why RBQM only delivers full value when it replaces, not supplements, traditional monitoring.

In today's ACT Brief, we examine value hidden in the RBQM financial model, why rare disease research leads on genuine patient partnership, and how safety concerns shape IBD treatment decisions despite clinical efficacy.

Patient-centricity remains largely consultative in most clinical research, yet rare disease communities demonstrate that genuine partnership from protocol inception improves feasibility, reduces unnecessary burden, and identifies outcomes that matter to patients themselves.

In this video interview, Sylviane de Viron of CluePoints and Abigail Dirks of Tufts CSDD discuss what the RBQM financial model left out—reduced rework, improved data integrity, and inspection readiness—and why those excluded factors could represent even greater value than what was modeled.

In today's ACT Brief, we examine why time savings dominates the financial case for RBQM investment, how the FDA is strengthening inspection access and data integrity review, and how data governance models shape real-world evidence quality.

Senior FDA leaders outline concrete steps to strengthen inspection coverage and data integrity review as the globalization of clinical research strains the agency's oversight capacity.

In this video interview, Sylviane de Viron of CluePoints and Abigail Dirks of Tufts CSDD explain why time savings dominates the eNPV model for RBQM—and what that means for how sponsors should frame the internal case for investment.

In today's ACT Brief, we examine why many trial failures trace to human readiness gaps rather than process design alone, how CRO consolidation expands early-phase capacity, and how AI-enabled patient matching is reshaping recruitment economics.

As sponsors push for faster, more representative studies, AI-enabled matching and EHR integration are emerging as operational levers, but bias, explainability, and governance will determine whether the technology scales.

The all-cash transaction adds a good laboratory practice-compliant bioanalytical laboratory, a 200-bed clinical pharmacology unit, and a biospecimen storage facility to Fortrea's early-phase development network.

This pilot episode of The Human Side of Clinical Trials introduces a framework from Brian S. McGowan, PhD, FACEHP, chief learning officer and co-founder of ArcheMedX, Inc., exploring why operational failures in clinical trials often trace back to gaps in human readiness rather than process design alone.

In today's ACT Brief, we examine how eNPV modeling and real-world data finally put numbers on RBQM value, why static budgeting masks true site costs, and GSK advancing an mRNA flu vaccine candidate to late-stage testing.

In this video interview, Sylviane de Viron of CluePoints and Abigail Dirks of Tufts CSDD explain how combining real-world deployment data with eNPV modeling finally made it possible to put a number on the financial value of RBQM—and why oncology was chosen as a conservative starting point.

Static budgeting models and one-size-fits-all fair market value approaches create visibility gaps around inflation and true site costs, but regional frameworks, standardized costing toolkits, and accountability metrics can rebuild trust and replace defensive negotiations with transparency.