Register Now: Beyond EDC: Designing a Connected Data Strategy for Predictive Clinical Development
Commentary|Videos|April 18, 2025

Leading the Technology and Innovation Front Through Rare Disease Research

In this video interview, Derek Ansel, vice president, therapeutic strategy lead, rare disease, Worldwide Clinical Trials, discusses how artificial intelligence can aid in bringing therapies to rare disease patients faster.

In a recent video interview with Applied Clinical Trials, Derek Ansel, vice president, therapeutic strategy lead, rare disease, Worldwide Clinical Trials, discussed the unique challenges in rare disease R&D, including competing priorities among researchers, difficulty in diagnosing and treating patients, and defining endpoints due to varying symptoms. Ansel also touched on the potential of technology and artificial intelligence to address some of these challenges and improve rare disease research.

ACT: Looking forward, what advancements or changes would you like to see in the rare disease space to make research more efficient and effective?

Ansel: I think fixing all of the items that I've already mentioned would be of utmost importance. Again, increasing greater global collaboration across the various stakeholders, I think, will always be critical. Rare is challenging. Rare is difficult because of, in essence, what a rare disease is, but I think if we can lay the framework around that global collaboration and working together really helps the next disease community pick up where other leaders have laid the ground there. I'm really encouraged by the use of technology and of AI (artificial intelligence), I'm very much of a skeptic when it comes to that type of technology for various reasons, if you’re interested, happy to discuss more, but I think for a community largely that's been built by technology in its very essence, parents and caregivers have created drugs because of the challenges we see in rare disease, communities have been born because of the internet and the ability to connect directly with other patients as a necessity, because those communities otherwise wouldn't exist. Rare disease, I feel, really leads the technology and innovation front in rare disease research, so I'm really excited to see how they are going to be using AI, whether that's helping diagnose patients faster by looking at pictures of children with dysmorphic features to help get a diagnosis earlier in life, or by using AI, there are various companies out there that are linking the various approved drugs out there. Could they be used to support and treat and increase quality of life in patients who otherwise wouldn't have access to those drugs, and that's really being leveraged by AI, instead of having humans mine through those various datasets themselves in a very manual way, can leverage those technologies to connect to researchers and connect patients to drugs faster.


Related to this article

Where the Industry Is Headed as Clinical, Operational, and Real-World Data Connect
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, describes the industry’s trajectory toward a unified intelligence orchestration environment—and explains why the future isn’t one model that knows everything, but a trusted system that brings the right evidence to the right human decision.
What Expanding AI Ecosystems Mean for Sponsor Complexity and Oversight
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, argues that CROs must act as orchestrators rather than aggregators—and that the real test of any AI ecosystem is whether it reduces sponsor coordination burden or just hands it back to them.
Where AI Governance in Clinical Development Falls Short
In this video interview, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, identifies three recurring failure modes in AI governance frameworks—and explains why responsible AI must be an ongoing operating discipline, not a one-time approval gate.
© putilov_denis - © putilov_denis - stock.adobe.com
Real-time clinical trials require standardized digital data capture at the point of care through scaled eSource-EDC-EHR integration, but progress stalls because competing standards lack regulatory enforcement and one-off system integrations cannot scale beyond single studies without industry-wide alignment and legal clarity on data ownership.
© photon_photo - © photon_photo - stock.adobe.com
Standardized measurement across five oncology centers found that clinical research coordinators rated eSource-enabled workflows positively (Overall Mean Satisfaction 5.79 of 7), with reduced manual entry and electronic data transfer earning strong marks, while perceived reduction in sponsor and monitor queries lagged as the one domain below threshold.