Community participation gaps look less like a question of patient willingness and more like a financing and infrastructure problem that no single bill has yet solved.
News|Webcasts|May 1, 2024
Navigating Participant Payment Challenges in Clinical Trials: A New Approach for Sponsors and Sites
Author(s)IQVIA
Webinar Date/Time: Thursday, June 6, 2024 Session 1: 9am EDT | 6am PDT | 2pm BST | 3pm CEST Session 2: 1pm EDT | 10am PDT | 6pm BST | 7pm CEST
Are you interested in learning about clinical trial participant payment best practices? Join IQVIA Technologies to learn how an innovative approach to manage participant payments can resolve global trial complexities and reduce administrative burden.
Register Free:
Join IQVIA Technologies for a webinar exploring the intricacies of clinical trial participant payments. As trials continue to grow in complexity and scale, understanding these intricacies, as well as effective practices for sponsors and sites to manage participant payments, is crucial.
This presentation considers the complexities of paying participants in a global study, the significant administrative burden placed on sites managing participant payments, and the urgent demand for a better solution. Don’t miss your chance to dig into this important topic and discuss a new approach to managing participant payments.
Three key take-aways
- Complexities of managing participant payments and their impact on trial operations and outcomes.
- Effective methods to manage participant payments and insights highlighting the interplay between people, processes, and technology.
A new approach to manage participant payments.
Speaker:
Shaun Williams
Senior Director, Clinical Trial Payment Solutions
IQVIA Technologies
Shaun Williams leads the Clinical Trial Payment Solutions business as Senior Director at IQVIA Technologies. Prior to joining IQVIA, Shaun held senior leadership positions at several life sciences companies including Syneos Health, Sitero, Premier Research, Grifols, and Baxter. Shaun was also a partner at ThinSpring, holds a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the United States Military Academy at West Point, and is a certified Project Management Professional. With over 30 years of experience in the life sciences industry, Shaun brings unique insight into the challenges faced by sponsors, CROs, patients, and vendors as they work to improve research processes, navigate regulatory affairs, drive operational improvements, and streamline financial management practices.
Register Free:
Related to this article
In this Q&A, Rajneesh Patil, global head of AI, digital, and innovation in clinical development at Syneos Health, discusses what changes when AI is embedded across protocol strategy, data infrastructure, and workflow tools at once, where governance frameworks tend to fall short, and why CROs must orchestrate AI ecosystems rather than simply aggregate them.
Pacing obesity trial enrollment, anchoring eligibility to stable real-world therapies, and building site and physician relationships improve retention and data quality more than aggressive recruitment or restrictive exclusion criteria do.
In this video interview, James Cheong, senior vice president of Asia Pacific at Precision for Medicine, explains how regulatory reform and inspection data contradict the view that APAC sites are slower or lower quality, and why sponsors need to update their assumptions.
In this Q&A, Kent Thoelke, CEO of Paradigm Health, discusses why participation gaps in community and rural settings come down to both patient cost barriers and site infrastructure, how legacy workflows weigh on community clinics, and what policy and technology changes it would take to make clinical research a real care option for more patients.
In this video interview, Kent Thoelke, CEO of Paradigm Health, explains why patients in community and rural settings too often lack access to clinical research as a care option, and how closing that gap could improve outcomes and lower long-term costs.
In this video interview, Kent Thoelke, CEO of Paradigm Health, explains why patient cost barriers and site infrastructure challenges must be solved together to close the participation gap in community and rural clinical trials.
Standardized measurement across five oncology centers found that clinical research coordinators rated eSource-enabled workflows positively (Overall Mean Satisfaction 5.79 of 7), with reduced manual entry and electronic data transfer earning strong marks, while perceived reduction in sponsor and monitor queries lagged as the one domain below threshold.
Trending on Applied Clinical Trials Online
1
The 10 Most Powerful Study KRIs in RBQM and GCP Issues They Can Prevent
2
From Complexity to Endpoint Meaningfulness: Addressing Key Neuroscience Trial Challenges with eCOA
3
Comparing OpenAI and Mistral on Clinical Trial Matching
4
What FDA Inspections Reveal About the Quality of APAC Clinical Trial Sites
5