
Regulatory
Latest News

Latest Videos

Shorts










More News

The FDA's launch of real-time clinical trial proof-of-concept studies signals a fundamental shift in regulatory oversight, one that most sponsors are not yet equipped to meet and that demands urgent investment in unified data infrastructure, quality-by-design practices, and protocol digitization.

Clinical data security built into system architecture from the foundation, rather than layered on afterward, reduces regulatory risk and actually accelerates research by removing manual compliance burden and improving team confidence in data integrity.

In this Q&A, Raj Indupuri, CEO and co-founder of eClinical Solutions, discusses what the FDA's push toward continuous data review actually demands of sponsors operationally, why fragmented systems are the core obstacle, and how AI and real-world evidence fit into a more data-driven regulatory environment.

From real-time evidence generation to federated AI to site-level data integration, ACT spoke with seven experts at DIA 2026 on the trends and challenges defining clinical trial operations today.

A coordinated department-wide initiative combines FDA regulatory reforms, NIH investments, and new agency programs to reduce development timelines and reverse a growing shift of clinical research overseas.

One Strategy, Two Jurisdictions: Unlocking Efficiency Across EU CTR and UK Regulatory Reform
How sponsors can leverage both the EU Clinical Trials Regulation and UK’s reformed framework to achieve cost efficiencies, faster timelines, and stronger regulatory positioning.

A Tufts CSDD study quantifies risk-based quality management's net financial value at $13.8 million per Phase III oncology trial, with ROI multiples up to 22.7x driven primarily by cycle time reductions rather than monitoring cost savings.

In this Q&A, Robert Hummel, chief operating officer at Suvoda, discusses how agentic AI is compressing RTSM build and deployment timelines, what safeguards are needed to maintain compliance and oversight at speed, and how intelligent automation will reshape the broader clinical trial technology stack over the next decade.

From rising costs and regulatory uncertainty to persistent vaccine hesitancy, sponsors face mounting pressure to standardize operations, build community trust, and develop the behavioral capabilities needed to run vaccine trials effectively in a rapidly shifting environment.

Real-world evidence is shifting from a post-market footnote to a concurrent validation layer running alongside trial data, requiring organizations to build unified data environments that integrate EHRs, claims, and patient-reported outcomes on an ongoing basis rather than retrospectively.

Despite clear data quality and regulatory advantages, paper-based clinical outcome assessments persist due to cost asymmetry, trial complexity, startup timelines, and provider capability gaps, though hidden paper costs and loss of institutional knowledge often outweigh upfront electronic implementation expenses.

In this Q&A, Adrelia Allen, executive director of clinical trial patient diversity at Merck, discusses how the company is embedding diversity into clinical trial execution—from protocol design and site selection to long-term community engagement that extends well beyond individual trial timelines.

The CNPV program has compressed drug review timelines to as little as one to two months for qualifying sponsors, but succeeding under that pressure requires a fundamental rethink of how development teams plan, communicate, and execute.

Clinical Trials Day is an international celebration of everyone who makes medical discoveries possible. It is also an opportunity to shine a light on the innovations helping to keep research rising.

Webcasts
Webinar Date/Time: Thursday, June 4th, 2026 at 11am EDT|8am PDT|4pm BST|5pm CEST

Pediatric trial participation shapes children's and caregivers' long-term psychological outcomes, yet protocol design often overlooks experience as a variable affecting recruitment, retention, and data integrity—a gap increasingly recognized by regulators and quality standards

FDA Commissioner Marty Makary’s departure caps a turbulent tenure marked by leadership instability, industry pushback, and a series of regulatory controversies that complicated drug development for sponsors and CROs.

As imaging-heavy clinical trials grow more complex and globally distributed, sponsors are increasingly re-evaluating traditional infrastructure models, with cloud-native platforms showing potential to reduce operational burden, accelerate site activation, improve imaging quality oversight, and lower total trial costs.

Zentails announced the first dosage of Azenosertib administered in its phase III Aspenova trial to test azenosertib vs chemotherapy in Cyclin E1-positive platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

FDA clears Cellenkos’ IND for CK0802, enabling a mid-stage trial in steroid-refractory GVHD.

In this video interview, Hal Green, senior solution architect and life sciences vertical lead EMEA at Loftware, traces how small documentation errors move through a fragmented supply chain and ultimately erode the trust that patients and regulators depend on.

FDA gives granted accelerated approval to lunsotogene parvec (Otarmeni) for OTOF-related sensorineural hearing loss based on early CHORD trial results in children.

In this video interview, Mark Freitas, managing director and life sciences practice lead at Alvarez & Marsal, explains why the most consequential shift in clinical trial design is not methodological but organizational, and what an analysis of 200 FDA complete response letters reveals about where decisions are going wrong.

In this Q&A, Mwango Kashoki, MD, MPH, SVP and global head of regulatory strategy at Parexel, breaks down the FDA's plausible mechanism framework and what it means for sponsors developing individualized therapies in ultra-rare disease settings.

In this video interview, Mwango Kashoki, MD, MPH, senior vice president and global head of regulatory strategy at Parexel, outlines the steps sponsors can take today—from early FDA engagement and robust non-clinical programs to adaptive trial designs and confirmatory evidence packages—to avoid delays as the guidance moves toward finalization.













