
CRO/Sponsor
Latest News

Latest Videos

More News

Investigator-initiated trials operate under the same regulatory and operational requirements as industry-sponsored studies but rely on fragmented, consumer-grade tools, creating a persistent technology gap that can impact data integrity, efficiency, and compliance.

The next phase of digital transformation in clinical research will not be defined by the number of platforms deployed, but by how well those platforms work together in service of participants, sites, and science.

In this video interview, Marc Buyse, ScD, founder and CEO of IDDI, reflects on the gap between sponsor expectations and statistical reality, drawing on lessons from the COVID era to argue for more pragmatic, cost-efficient trial execution and greater patient access to clinical research.

In this video interview, David Morton, PhD, director of biostatistics at Certara, explains how regulatory momentum is encouraging sponsors to move beyond traditional methods, leveraging Bayesian frameworks to improve efficiency, particularly in rare disease and small population studies.

As sponsors navigate rising complexity, AI adoption, and global scale, outsourcing strategies are shifting toward hybrid models, deeper CRO collaboration, and function-level flexibility to support execution in 2026.

Sylviane de Viron, data and knowledge manager at CluePoints, shares new data highlighting regional variations in clinical trial risks—and how proactive risk planning based on up-to-date data is needed to overcome them.

Holly Leslie, vice president of services at Ledger Run, discusses how persistent payment friction, increasing administrative burden from AI-generated queries, and lack of sponsor accountability are pushing sites to become more selective—favoring sponsors that pay transparently, reduce operational strain, and treat site experience with the same rigor as patient recruitment.

Otis Johnson, PhD, MPA, founder and principal consultant at Vantix Operations, discusses why suppliers must shift from ESG activity to decision-grade evidence, and how embedding sustainability into clinical research quality could reshape sponsor expectations, oversight, and supplier selection in the years ahead.

Raja Shankar, VP of machine learning at IQVIA, discusses which AI capabilities sponsors are most likely to adopt first to streamline trial workflows and reduce operational burden, while also highlighting emerging applications that could shape the next phase of clinical trial design.

Charlie Paterson, partner at PA Consulting, explains how mixed signals on FDA risk tolerance are accelerating the globalization of clinical trial programs and reshaping how sponsors align development activities worldwide.

Holly Leslie, vice president of services at Ledger Run, explains why site selectivity is not yet universal, but increasingly driven by larger, more sophisticated sites that are demanding stronger remuneration policies and greater leverage in sponsor relationships.

Today's biopharmaceutical landscape demands a fundamental rethinking of outsourcing approaches that embrace collaboration, flexibility, and teams willing to meet halfway.

Charlie Paterson, partner at PA Consulting, discusses how fewer new guidance updates are pushing sponsors to rely on historical precedents and non-US standards when making trial design and operational decisions.

As trials expand into new geographies and decentralized models mature, sponsors are confronting a core operational challenge in 2026: how to scale global execution while reducing system complexity and day-to-day burden on research sites.

As ESG expectations rise across clinical development, sponsors are finding that sustainability efforts gain traction only when embedded into existing vendor oversight and quality management processes rather than treated as a standalone reporting exercise.

Assess the data quality, linkage, transparency, and auditability challenges that sponsors must overcome to make de-identified real-world evidence fit for regulatory submissions.

A look at how efficiency, access, platformization, AI, non-traditional players, and regulatory recovery are expected to reshape clinical operations in 2026.

Global clinical development has evolved into a technology-enabled, highly regulated, and geographically diversified enterprise, as sponsors adapt trial design, partnerships, and operations to meet rising demands for scale, speed, and patient-centricity.

Consider how sponsor and CRO practices that prioritize site needs, clarity, and partnership can strengthen trust, sustain momentum, and speed activation without sacrificing the human experience.

Unpack why persistent communication breakdowns between sponsors, CROs, and sites undermine startup efficiency—and how bidirectional, site-informed engagement models can improve collaboration and momentum.

See what will distinguish sponsors that scale AI into core operations from those stuck in experimentation, and why redesigning underlying processes—not just optimizing workflows—is critical to realizing long-term value.

The clinical trial ecosystem is entering a phase of consolidation and reinvention driven by the collapse of boundaries between functions, data, and even companies themselves.

Persistent delays and inefficiencies in COA licensing and translation stem from limited pre-license access and fragmented processes, making a strong case for providing outcome assessment measures earlier to reduce risk and accelerate trial start-up.

Learn how real-time patient eligibility data is reshaping trial planning and site selection, allowing sponsors to design more inclusive studies based on current patient reality rather than past performance.

Unpack how rising competition for the same high-profile sites is slowing startup and enrollment—and what sponsors must change in their site strategies to ensure AI-enabled efficiencies translate into real-world impact.













